Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Author: Thanh Le

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages: 50

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This study evaluates corner clearance at signalized intersections under the Development of Crash Modification Factors program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. Geometric, traffic, and crash data were obtained for signalized intersections with various corner clearances from the State of California and the City of Charlotte, North Carolina. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of corner clearance while controlling for other differences among study sites. The estimated CMFs indicated that more limited clearance (i.e., driveway(s) within 50 ft of the signalized intersection) on receiving corners was associated with increases for all crash types, based on the data included in this analysis. These increases were statistically significant at the 90-percent level or greater for total, fatal and injury, rear-end, sideswipe, right-angle, and nighttime crashes. Only the results for turning crashes were not statistically significant at the 90-percent level. For limited corner clearance on the approach corners, the results indicated statistically significant reductions in total, fatal and injury, and rear-end crashes. The results also indicated reductions in sideswipe and nighttime crashes, and increases in right-angle and turning crashes, but none of these results were statistically significant at the 90-percent level.


Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Author: Thanh Le (Highway engineer)

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages: 50

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This study evaluates corner clearance at signalized intersections under the Development of Crash Modification Factors program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. Geometric, traffic, and crash data were obtained for signalized intersections with various corner clearances from the State of California and the City of Charlotte, North Carolina. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of corner clearance while controlling for other differences among study sites. The estimated CMFs indicated that more limited clearance (i.e., driveway(s) within 50 ft of the signalized intersection) on receiving corners was associated with increases for all crash types, based on the data included in this analysis. These increases were statistically significant at the 90-percent level or greater for total, fatal and injury, rear-end, sideswipe, right-angle, and nighttime crashes. Only the results for turning crashes were not statistically significant at the 90-percent level. For limited corner clearance on the approach corners, the results indicated statistically significant reductions in total, fatal and injury, and rear-end crashes. The results also indicated reductions in sideswipe and nighttime crashes, and increases in right-angle and turning crashes, but none of these results were statistically significant at the 90-percent level.


Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages: 12

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This document is a technical summary of the Federal Highway Administration report Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections (FHWA-HRT-17-084). This study’s objective was to undertake a rigorous cross-sectional evaluation of the safety effects, as measured by crash frequency, of mainline corner clearance at four-legged, signalized intersections. The study compared signalized intersections with various corner clearance using data from California and Charlotte, North Carolina, to examine the effects on specific crash types: total, fatal and injury, rear end, sideswipe, right-angle, turning, and nighttime crashes. The study did not investigate the effects of corner clearance on the cross-street approaches or intersections with three legs or more than four legs.


Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections

Author: Raghavan Srinivasan

Publisher: Transportation Research Board

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 48

ISBN-13: 0309213452

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 705: Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections explores crash modification factors (CMFs) for safety strategies at signalized intersections. CMFs are a tool for quickly estimating the impact of safety improvements.


Development of a Safety Evaluation Procedure for Identifying High-risk Signalized Intersections in the Virginia Department of Transportation's Northern Virginia District

Development of a Safety Evaluation Procedure for Identifying High-risk Signalized Intersections in the Virginia Department of Transportation's Northern Virginia District

Author: Young-Jun Kweon

Publisher:

Published: 2007

Total Pages: 86

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This research was undertaken to develop an evaluation procedure to identify high-risk four-legged signalized intersections in VDOT's Northern Virginia district by traffic movements and times of day. By using the developed procedure, traffic engineers are expected to be able to identify signalized intersections where the traffic crash occurrences under different traffic conditions for different times of day are more frequent than would normally be expected. Using generalized linear models such as negative binomial models, one safety performance function was estimated for each of nine crash population reference groups formed by three traffic crash patterns (crash patterns 1, 4, and 6) and four times of day (A.M. peak, mid day, P.M. peak, and evening off peak). Crash pattern 1 is a same-direction crash (rear-end, sideswipe or angle crash) that occurs after exiting the intersection; crash pattern 4 is a right-angle crash between two adjacent straight-through vehicle movements in the intersection; and crash pattern 6 is an angle or head-on or opposite sideswipe crash between a straight-through vehicle movement and an opposing left-turn vehicle movement in the intersection. The procedure developed in this study is based on the empirical Bayes (EB) method. Additional data do not need to be collected in order to use the EB procedure because all the data required for applying the EB procedure should be obtainable from VDOT's crash database and from Synchro input data that are already available to traffic engineers for traffic signal phase plans. Thus, the EB procedure is cost-effective and readily applicable. For easy application of the EB procedure, an EB spreadsheet was developed using Microsoft Excel, and a users' guide was prepared. These are available from the author upon request.


A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2018

A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2018

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages:

ISBN-13: 9781523119592

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Highway engineers, as designers, strive to meet the needs of highway users while maintaining the integrity of the environment. Unique combinations of design controls and constraints that are often conflicting call for unique design solutions. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets provides guidance based on established practices that are supplemented by recent research. This document is also intended as a comprehensive reference manual to assist in administrative, planning, and educational efforts pertaining to design formulation


Roundabouts

Roundabouts

Author: Lee August Rodegerdts

Publisher: Transportation Research Board

Published: 2010

Total Pages: 407

ISBN-13: 0309155118

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide - Second Edition explores the planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operation of roundabouts. The report also addresses issues that may be useful in helping to explain the trade-offs associated with roundabouts. This report updates the U.S. Federal Highway Administration's Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, based on experience gained in the United States since that guide was published in 2000.