House documents
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1892
Total Pages: 1194
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1892
Total Pages: 2
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Surgeon General's Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health
Publisher:
Published: 1964
Total Pages: 406
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John M. Curran
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 24
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1963
Total Pages: 960
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1917
Total Pages: 994
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Joseph Kelly Turner
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 568
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Congress
Publisher:
Published: 1892
Total Pages: 1018
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)
Author: Theodore M. Porter
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Published: 2020-08-18
Total Pages: 336
ISBN-13: 0691210543
DOWNLOAD EBOOKA foundational work on historical and social studies of quantification What accounts for the prestige of quantitative methods? The usual answer is that quantification is desirable in social investigation as a result of its successes in science. Trust in Numbers questions whether such success in the study of stars, molecules, or cells should be an attractive model for research on human societies, and examines why the natural sciences are highly quantitative in the first place. Theodore Porter argues that a better understanding of the attractions of quantification in business, government, and social research brings a fresh perspective to its role in psychology, physics, and medicine. Quantitative rigor is not inherent in science but arises from political and social pressures, and objectivity derives its impetus from cultural contexts. In a new preface, the author sheds light on the current infatuation with quantitative methods, particularly at the intersection of science and bureaucracy.