The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980. A Retrospective Assessment

The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980. A Retrospective Assessment

Author: Bernard Rostker

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 118

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Congress enacted the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act (DOPMA) on December 12, 1980. The new code replaced an existing patchwork of rules and regulations governing the management of military officers and updated numerical constraints on the number of field-grade officers (0-4 through 0-6) that each service might have as a percentage of its officer corps. It was the Congress's expectation that DOPMA would 'maintain a high-quality, numerically sufficient officer corps, provide career opportunity that would attract and retain the numbers of high-caliber officers needed, (and) provide reasonably consistent career opportunity among the services.' In September 1990, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel) asked RAND to review the past ten years of operations of DOPMA, to identify and appraise any difficulties in manpower management that may have developed from that legislation.


The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980

The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980

Author: Bernard Rostker

Publisher: Rand Corporation

Published: 1993-01-01

Total Pages: 107

ISBN-13: 9780833012876

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act (DOPMA), enacted in 1980, replaced an existing patchwork of rules and regulations governing the management of military officers, and updated numerical constraints on the number of field grade officers (0-4 through 0-6) that each service might have. While breaking new ground (permanent grade tables, single promotion system, augmentation of reserve officers into regular status), DOPMA was basically evolutionary, extending the existing paradigm (grade controls, promotion opportunity and timing objectives, up-or-out, and uniformity across the services) that was established after World War II. The authors found that DOPMA was a better static description of the desired officer structure than dynamic management tool. In retrospect, DOPMA could neither handily control the growth in the officer corps in the early part of the 1980s nor flexibly manage the reduction-in-force in the latter part of the decade. In the current dynamic environment, DOPMA cannot meet all its stated objectives. Congress has provided some flexibility in officer management, but in so doing, major tenets of DOPMA have been voided. DOPMA forces choice between grade table violations (law) or diminution of proffered tenure (law) and proffered promotion opportunity/timing (policy, promise) in a period of reductions. Moreover, the implicit assumption that the officer management system should be able to adjust instantaneously (as seen in the way the grade table is implemented) points to the need for further flexibility to meet short-term needs. The authors recommend flexibility through a longer adjustment period for the services to accommodate reductions mandated by the DOPMA grade table.


Challenging Time in DOPMA

Challenging Time in DOPMA

Author: Peter Schirmer

Publisher: Rand Corporation

Published: 2006

Total Pages: 116

ISBN-13: 0833039482

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"Many of the laws and policies that govern officer career management (often collectively referred to as "DOPMA," after the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980) have been in place for decades. DOPMA has served the needs of the services reasonably well, but the current system may not meet the requirements of the future operating environment. One criticism of DOPMA is that it does not allow for much variety in officers' career paths because it is time-driven. Alternatively, officers' competencies are now emerging as the basis for career management. In this monograph, the authors demonstrate how a competency-based officer personnel management system could provide more flexibility in preparing military officers for the wide range of roles and missions of the U.S. military in the 21st century. This analysis focuses on practices governing promotions for military officers and closely related assignment and retirement policies."--Rand web site


Defense Officer Personnel Management Act for Medical Officer Pay and Entitlements

Defense Officer Personnel Management Act for Medical Officer Pay and Entitlements

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act (the Act) for Medical Officer Pay and Entitlements was passed in December 1980, and was implemented on September 15, 1981. The Act eliminated constructive service credit for pay purposes for students who enrolled in the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) and the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) after September 14, 1981. Constructive service credit was no longer needed for longevity pay purposes because the Act restructured the pay system for military health professionals. Our objective was to determine whether the Act was properly implemented for medical officer pay and entitlements. We also evaluated whether the Boards for the Correction of Military and Naval Records (the Boards) acted appropriately in subsequently awarding constructive service credit for pay purposes to the 1985 and 1986 USUHS and HPSP graduates (the first graduating classes to be affected by the Act). Specifically, we determined whether the Boards' actions were within the scope of their authority and were procedurally sound.


Officer Personnel Management

Officer Personnel Management

Author: E. W. Chamberlain

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 39

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Army is not meeting its promotion obligations in the field grade ranks, and is not in compliance with the provisions of the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980 (DOPMA) and the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986. Specifically, the Army lags behind the Navy, Air Force, and DOPMA in percentages of officers selected for field grade promotion and on pin on points. Additionally, the Army is failing to achieve minimum promotion floors for joint service officers to the rank of colonel. Although the current downsizing of the Army is a partial contributor to this situation, the problems existed before the downsizing started. Current Army personnel and selection board practices, and projected solutions to the field grade and joint officer promotion problems are incremental, and they will not solve these problems in the long term. The personnel management tools are available to correct the promotion problems, but this can only occur if the Army changes its paradigms on officer promotion, retention and assignments. This study proposes long term solutions utilizing additional personnel management tools and changes in the Army's personnel management and promotion paradigms. The purpose of the proposed changes are for the Army to achieve conformity with existing laws, and to maintain an officer corps that is trained and ready for land warfare into the 21st Century.


General and Flag Officer Careers: Consequences of Increased Tenure

General and Flag Officer Careers: Consequences of Increased Tenure

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2001

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Congress has long taken a keen interest in the management of officer careers. It played a major role in the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act of 1980, the legislation that currently governs officer personnel management in all services. Recently, it has turned its attention to the tenure of the most senior military personnel, the general and flag officers. Although current law permits exceptions, it requires most flag-rank officers to retire once they have 35 years of active commissioned service. Congress is concerned that the current system does not adequately prepare officers for the most senior assignments. As a result of these concerns, Congress asked the Secretary of Defense to review the career patterns of flag-rank officers. It requested specific data about average time-in-grade both when selected and when promoted as well as the length of tours. It also asked the Secretary to assess the appropriateness of mandatory retirement at 35 years.