Indicator Systems for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education
Indicator Systems for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education

Author: Richard J. Shavelson

Publisher: Rand Corporation

Published: 1987

Total Pages: 82

ISBN-13: 9780833008046

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The demand for more valid and useful educational indicators has grown significantly as national, state, and local agencies have moved to improve the quality of elementary and secondary education. At the national level, there is a growing need for more systematic information about student performance in mathematics and science, about the content of courses taught, and about the quality of mathematics and science teachers. At the state and local levels, increased academic standards have led to a need for more sophisticated measures of the processes and outcomes of schooling. No comprehensive indicator system is available to measure the status of mathematics and science education in the United States. This report addresses the question of the National Science Foundation's role in monitoring mathematics and science education. The report identifies several options for developing a system of education indicators, i.e., measures that report the condition of particularly significant features of mathematics and science education, and then assesses each option in terms of its usefulness, feasibility, and compatibility with other national and state efforts to monitor educational performance. (CW)

Indicators for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education
Indicators for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education

Author: Richard J. Shavelson

Publisher:

Published: 1989

Total Pages: 348

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This report contains a collection of papers summarizing the majorresearch on elementary and secondary schooling conducted over the past decade, and outlining what those studies suggest for designing improved educational indicators. The report includes a section on the design of educational indicator systems. It also includes sections on indicators of educational resources and commitment; school context and organization; teachers and teaching; curriculum; instruction; outcomes, achievement, participation, and attitudes; the distribution of educational opportunities and outcomes; policy problems; and school completion and dropouts. Finally, it discusses the policy context in which indicators are generated and used.

Improving Indicators of the Quality of Science and Mathematics Education in Grades K-12
Improving Indicators of the Quality of Science and Mathematics Education in Grades K-12

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 1988-02-01

Total Pages: 231

ISBN-13: 0309037409

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book presents a carefully developed monitoring system to track the progress of mathematics and science education, particularly the effects of ongoing efforts to improve students' scientific knowledge and mathematics competency. It describes an improved series of indicators to assess student learning, curriculum quality, teaching effectiveness, student behavior, and financial and leadership support for mathematics and science education. Of special interest is a critical review of current testing methods and their use in probing higher-order skills and evaluating educational quality.

Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education
Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education

Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2018-04-08

Total Pages: 245

ISBN-13: 0309467888

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professionals generate a stream of scientific discoveries and technological innovations that fuel job creation and national economic growth. Ensuring a robust supply of these professionals is critical for sustaining growth and creating jobs growth at a time of intense global competition. Undergraduate STEM education prepares the STEM professionals of today and those of tomorrow, while also helping all students develop knowledge and skills they can draw on in a variety of occupations and as individual citizens. However, many capable students intending to major in STEM later switch to another field or drop out of higher education altogether, partly because of documented weaknesses in STEM teaching, learning and student supports. Improving undergraduate STEM education to address these weaknesses is a national imperative. Many initiatives are now underway to improve the quality of undergraduate STEM teaching and learning. Some focus on the national level, others involve multi-institution collaborations, and others take place on individual campuses. At present, however, policymakers and the public do not know whether these various initiatives are accomplishing their goals and leading to nationwide improvement in undergraduate STEM education. Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education outlines a framework and a set of indicators that document the status and quality of undergraduate STEM education at the national level over multiple years. It also indicates areas where additional research is needed in order to develop appropriate measures. This publication will be valuable to government agencies that make investments in higher education, institutions of higher education, private funders of higher education programs, and industry stakeholders. It will also be of interest to researchers who study higher education.

Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education
Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2013-04-25

Total Pages: 65

ISBN-13: 0309264812

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Following a 2011 report by the National Research Council (NRC) on successful K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), Congress asked the National Science Foundation to identify methods for tracking progress toward the report's recommendations. In response, the NRC convened the Committee on an Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education to take on this assignment. The committee developed 14 indicators linked to the 2011 report's recommendations. By providing a focused set of key indicators related to students' access to quality learning, educator's capacity, and policy and funding initiatives in STEM, the committee addresses the need for research and data that can be used to monitor progress in K-12 STEM education and make informed decisions about improving it. The recommended indicators provide a framework for Congress and relevant deferral agencies to create and implement a national-level monitoring and reporting system that: assesses progress toward key improvements recommended by a previous National Research Council (2011) committee; measures student knowledge, interest, and participation in the STEM disciplines and STEM-related activities; tracks financial, human capital, and material investments in K-12 STEM education at the federal, state, and local levels; provides information about the capabilities of the STEM education workforce, including teachers and principals; and facilitates strategic planning for federal investments in STEM education and workforce development when used with labor force projections. All 14 indicators explained in this report are intended to form the core of this system. Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education: A Nation Advancing? summarizes the 14 indicators and tracks progress towards the initial report's recommendations.

Indicators of Precollege Education in Science and Mathematics
Indicators of Precollege Education in Science and Mathematics

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 1985-01-01

Total Pages: 211

ISBN-13: 0309035368

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Many studies point to the inadequacy of precollege education in the United States. How can it be improved? The development of effective policy requires information on the condition of education and the ability to measure change. This book lays out a framework for an efficient monitoring system. Key variables include teacher quality and quantity, course content, instructional time and enrollment, and student achievement.