Journal Sup. Court, U.S.
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 550
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 550
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
Published: 1922
Total Pages: 668
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
Published: 1922
Total Pages: 834
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 862
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1922
Total Pages: 882
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Theodore Schroeder
Publisher:
Published: 1922
Total Pages: 264
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress
Publisher:
Published: 1972
Total Pages: 708
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 712
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Dean Strang
Publisher: University of Wisconsin Press
Published: 2019-06-18
Total Pages: 345
ISBN-13: 0299323307
DOWNLOAD EBOOKBefore World War I, the government reaction to labor dissent had been local, ad hoc, and quasi-military. Sheriffs, mayors, or governors would deputize strikebreakers or call out the state militia, usually at the bidding of employers. When the United States entered the conflict in 1917, government and industry feared that strikes would endanger war production; a more coordinated, national strategy would be necessary. To prevent stoppages, the Department of Justice embarked on a sweeping new effort—replacing gunmen with lawyers. The department systematically targeted the nation’s most radical and innovative union, the Industrial Workers of the World, also known as the Wobblies, resulting in the largest mass trial in U.S. history. In the first legal history of this federal trial, Dean Strang shows how the case laid the groundwork for a fundamentally different strategy to stifle radical threats, and had a major role in shaping the modern Justice Department. As the trial unfolded, it became an exercise of raw force, raising serious questions about its legitimacy and revealing the fragility of a criminal justice system under great external pressure.