The Organized Militia of the United States
Author: United States. Adjutant-General's Office. Military Information Division
Publisher:
Published: 1898
Total Pages: 604
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States. Adjutant-General's Office. Military Information Division
Publisher:
Published: 1898
Total Pages: 604
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Jerry Cooper
Publisher: U of Nebraska Press
Published: 2002-12-01
Total Pages: 276
ISBN-13: 9780803264281
DOWNLOAD EBOOKFrom the beginning of our republic the concept of a citizen soldiery, organized throughømilitias, has undergirded American military philosophy. This nation fought the Revolution, the War of 1812, and the Mexican War, and began the Civil War, relying on volunteer militias and only a skeletal professional military force. The Civil War demonstrated the need to adapt state militias to the requirements of modern war, yet the United States retained its original philosophy in what became the National Guard. The Rise of the National Guard describes in thorough detail the evolution of the state militia system to a more federally controlled National Guard during the crucial years of development. The subject is important because the "citizen soldier" and "militia-national guard" traditions form one of the two pillars on which American military policy is built; a professional, regular military force is the other. Jerry Cooper's detailed research, unique examination of the experience of individual states, and careful analysis make this work the standard treatment of the subject.
Author: C. Edward Skeen
Publisher: University Press of Kentucky
Published: 2014-07-11
Total Pages: 240
ISBN-13: 081314955X
DOWNLOAD EBOOKWinner of the Army Historical Foundation Book Award During the War of 1812, state militias were intended to be the primary fighting force. Unfortunately, while militiamen showed willingness to fight, they were untrained, undisciplined, and ill-equipped. These raw volunteers had no muskets, and many did not know how to use the weapons once they had been issued. Though established by the Constitution, state militias found themselves wholly unprepared for war. The federal government was empowered to use these militias to "execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions;" but in a system of divided responsibility, it was the states' job to appoint officers and to train the soldiers. Edward Skeen reveals states' responses to federal requests for troops and provides in-depth descriptions of the conditions, morale, and experiences of the militia in camp and in battle. Skeen documents the failures and successes of the militias, concluding that the key lay in strong leadership. He also explores public perception of the force, both before and after the war, and examines how the militias changed in response to their performance in the War of 1812. After that time, the federal government increasingly neglected the militias in favor of a regular professional army.
Author: Saul Cornell
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2006
Total Pages: 289
ISBN-13: 0195341031
DOWNLOAD EBOOKA leading constitutional historian argues that the Founding Fathers viewed the right to bear arms as neither an individual nor a collective right, but rather an obligation a citizen owed to the government to arm themselves and participate in a well-regulated militia.
Author: Emory Upton
Publisher:
Published: 1912
Total Pages: 534
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Charles P. Cozic
Publisher: Greenhaven Press, Incorporated
Published: 1997
Total Pages: 102
ISBN-13: 9781565105416
DOWNLOAD EBOOKCollection of essays representing differing points of view about the militia movement of the 1990s.
Author: United States
Publisher:
Published: 1893
Total Pages: 66
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: H. Richard Uviller
Publisher: Duke University Press
Published: 2002
Total Pages: 358
ISBN-13: 9780822330172
DOWNLOAD EBOOKDIVProvides a historically grounded examination of the original meaning of the 2nd Amendment and an interpretation of the rights it safeguards (or doesn't) in the light of that historical understanding./div