The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Each state and jurisdiction that participated in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2011 reading assessment receives a one-page snapshot report that presents key findings and trends in a condensed format. Overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average score in 2011 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2011, and score gaps for student groups are included. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Washington was 221. This was not significantly different from the average score of 220 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in Washington in 2011 (221) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (221) and was higher than their average score in 1994 (213). In 2011, the score gap between students in Washington at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 48 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 1994 (50 points). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 34 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (33 percent) and was greater than that in 1994 (27 percent). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 67 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (68 percent) and was greater than that in 1994 (59 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-457," see ED525544.].


The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Each state and jurisdiction that participated in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2011 reading assessment receives a one-page snapshot report that presents key findings and trends in a condensed format. Overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average score in 2011 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2011, and score gaps for student groups are included. In 2011, the average score of eighth-grade students in Washington was 268. This was higher than the average score of 264 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in Washington in 2011 (268) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (267) and was higher than their average score in 1998 (264). In 2011, the score gap between students in Washington at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 47 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 1998 (43 points). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 37 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (36 percent) and was greater than that in 1998 (32 percent). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 77 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (78 percent) and was not significantly different from that in 1998 (76 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-457," see ED525544.].


The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Results from the 2013 NAEP assessments show fourth- and eighth-graders making progress in mathematics and reading. Nationally representative samples of more than 376,000 fourth-graders and 341,000 eighth-graders were assessed in either mathematics or reading in 2013. Results are reported for public and private school students in the nation, and for public school students in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Department of Defense schools. This snapshot report covers the overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average scores in 2013 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Washington was 225. This was higher than the average score of 221 for public school students in the nation. ?The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (225) was higher than their average score in 2011 (221) and in 1994 (213). ?The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 46 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1994 (50 points). ?The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 40 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (34 percent) and in 1994 (27 percent). ?The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 72 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (67 percent) and in 1994 (59 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2014-451," see ED544347.].


The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 4, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Results from the 2013 NAEP assessments show fourth- and eighth-graders making progress in mathematics and reading. Nationally representative samples of more than 376,000 fourth-graders and 341,000 eighth-graders were assessed in either mathematics or reading in 2013. Results are reported for public and private school students in the nation, and for public school students in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Department of Defense schools. This snapshot report covers the overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average scores in 2013 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Washington was 246. This was higher than the average score of 241 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (246) was higher than their average score in 2011 (243) and in 1996 (225). The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 39 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1996 (39 points). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 48 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (45 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (21 percent). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 86 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (83 percent) and in 1996 (67 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2014-451," see ED544347.].


The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Results from the 2013 NAEP assessments show fourth- and eighth-graders making progress in mathematics and reading. Nationally representative samples of more than 376,000 fourth-graders and 341,000 eighth-graders were assessed in either mathematics or reading in 2013. Results are reported for public and private school students in the nation, and for public school students in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Department of Defense schools. This snapshot report covers the overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average scores in 2013 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Washington was 272. This was higher than the average score of 266 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (272) was higher than their average score in 2011 (268) and in 1998 (264). The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 45 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1998 (43 points). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 42 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (37 percent) and in 1998 (32 percent). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 81 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (77 percent) and in 1998 (76 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2014-451," see ED544347.].


An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia

An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2015-08-31

Total Pages: 249

ISBN-13: 0309373832

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia is a comprehensive five-year summative evaluation report for Phase Two of an initiative to evaluate the District of Columbia's public schools. Consistent with the recommendations in the 2011 report A Plan for Evaluating the District of Columbia's Public Schools, this new report describes changes in the public schools during the period from 2009 to 2013. An Evaluation of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia examines business practices, human resources operations and human capital strategies, academic plans, and student achievement. This report identifies what is working well seven years after legislation was enacted to give control of public schools to the mayor of the District of Columbia and which areas need additional attention.


The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 1

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Results from the 2013 NAEP assessments show fourth-and eighth-graders making progress in mathematics and reading. Nationally representative samples of more than 376,000 fourth-graders and 341,000 eighth-graders were assessed in either mathematics or reading in 2013. Results are reported for public and private school students in the nation, and for public school students in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Department of Defense schools. This snapshot report covers the overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, comparison of the average scores in 2013 to other states/jurisdictions, average scores for state/jurisdiction and nation (public), results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Washington was 290. This was higher than the average score of 284 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (290) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (288) and was higher than their average score in 1996 (276). The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 48 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1996 (47 points). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 42 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (40 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (26 percent). The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 79 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (77 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (67 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2014-451," see ED544347.].


Use of Visual Displays in Research and Testing

Use of Visual Displays in Research and Testing

Author: Matthew T. McCrudden

Publisher: IAP

Published: 2015-05-01

Total Pages: 347

ISBN-13: 1681231034

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Visual displays play a crucial role in knowledge generation and communication. The purpose of the volume is to provide researchers with a framework that helps them use visual displays to organize and interpret data; and to communicate their findings in a comprehensible way within different research (e.g., quantitative, mixed methods) and testing traditions that improves the presentation and understanding of findings. Further, this book includes contributions from leading scholars in testing and quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research, and results reporting. The volume’s focal question is: What are the best principles and practices for the use of visual displays in the research and testing process, which broadly includes the analysis, organization, interpretation, and communication of data? The volume is organized into four sections. Section I provides a rationale for this volume; namely, that including visual displays in research and testing can enhance comprehension and processing efficiency. Section II includes addresses theoretical frameworks and universal design principles for visual displays. Section III examines the use of visual displays in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. Section IV focuses on using visual displays to report testing and assessment data.


Brainless Sameness

Brainless Sameness

Author: Bob Sornson

Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield

Published: 2018-08-16

Total Pages: 150

ISBN-13: 1475844883

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book offers a careful look at how we came to have our traditional education system, and how it met the needs of a different time. By looking back at the past we can take on the task of change without casting blame, but with understanding. We will consider the systems design of the curriculum driven one-size-fits-all educational model, why it no longer meets our needs, and how to devise a system which can deliver a better future for our children and for ourselves as educators.