Author: William Mark McKinney

Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com

Published: 2013-09

Total Pages: 636

ISBN-13: 9781230193052

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: ...the pro sion to file the original papers, as re-ceedings appearing upon the record of quired by statute, in the court to the court, which, together with the which the change is made, is not indictment and all other papers in the waived by the appearance of the case, must be transmitted to the clerk party against whom the change was of the court to which the venue has made, for the purpose of moving to been changed," simply requires a tran dismiss the action. Hall v. Royce, script of the entries in the "record 56 Iowa 359. 3. Harrall v. State, 26 Ala. 52. See Ammons v. State, 9 Fla. 530. "Proceedings" Denned.--"Proceedings," in a statute requiring transmission of a transcript of the proceedings, merely means the orders made book," together with the indictment and all the papers, but does not require the transmission of a transcript of the indictment and of all the original papers as well as the papers themselves. Sharp v. State, 2 Iowa 454. Under a statute requiring the transaffidavit, and information thereon to be transmitted;1 but in some jurisdictions mere copies or transcripts are sufficient. b. Sufficiency Of Transcript.--Where all the original papers, or copies thereof, are not required to be transmitted, a transcript of the record should be sent for the purpose of acquainting the new court with the status of the case. mission of the transcript and the original papers, it is unnecessary that the indictment should be copied at length in the transcript. Powers v. State, 87 Ind. 144. The transcript need not contain a copy of the indictment, where the original indictment is sufficiently identified by being sealed up and transmitted with the transcript and other papers. Leslie v. State, 83 Ind. 180....