Excerpt from The Appeal Court Reports, 1907, Vol. 1 The fact that there was a previous verbal proposal and acceptance did not prevent the plaintifi' from relying on the written promise contained in the letter. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from The Appeal Court Reports, 1907, Vol. 2 About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Excerpt from Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Vol. 107: From June 1, 1907, to March 1, 1908 Ackiss and Nottingham, Adams Tidewater R. Co., Albert v. Tidewater R. Co., Austin Minor, Barbour v. Grimsley, Barnes v. Tidewater R. Co., Battershall 13. Roberts, Beale v. Pankey. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from The Appeal Court Reports, 1909, Vol. 5 Partition action - Interlocutory decree - When it should be made - Power of Court to amend. An interlocntory decree iu a partition action ought to be made after such investigation of title as the Court thinks sufficient; and, in any case, it ought not to be made upon n mere agreement of the parties to the action as to the shares which they will take. Then further investigation takes place; and, as a result, the Court has power to confirm the interlocutory decree, or to vary it, or to make a wholly different Older. Balasingham for appellant. Judgment. Hutchinson, C. J. - This is a partition action in which the then District Judge, Mr. Sanders, on the 1st of June, 1908, made an interlocutory decree for partition of the land between the plaintiff and the defendant. The only investigation of title that was made before that decree was the evidence given by the plaintiff; but that evidence alone does not appear sufficient to warrant the order. The appellant, who is the 1st defendant, then applied to tho District Court to set aside the interlocutory decree. The application was made to Mr. Sanders' successor in office, Mr. Thaine. He held that he had no power to set the interlocutory decree aside. I think that he had power to do so. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from The Miscellaneous Reports, 1907, Vol. 53: Cases Decided in the Courts of Record of the State of New York, Other Than the Court of Appeals and the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court Lewis county. Livingston county. Madison county. Monroe county. Montgomery county. Nassau county. Niagara county. Oneida county. Onondaga county. Ontario county. Orange county. Orleans county. Oswego county. Otsego county. Putnam county. Queens county. Rensselaer county. Richmond county. Rockland county. St. Lawrence county Saratoga county. Schenectady county Schoharie county. Schuyler county. Seneca county. Steuben county. Suffolk county. Sullivan county. Tioga county. Tompkins county. Ulster county. Warren county. Washington county. Wayne county. Westchester county. Wyoming county. Yates county. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Appeals, and in the General Court, of Virginia, Vol. 1: From April 1, 1842, to April 1, 1843 The following reports of decisions of the court of appeals were published on private account. Two volumes by Bushrod Washington, embracing the period from 1790 to 1796; of which there was a second edition in 1823. Three volumes by Daniel Call, containing at the end of the third volume some cases decided in 1790, and in the three volumes a regular series from 1797 to 1803. A second edition of these three volumes, by Joseph Tate, was published in 1824. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
