Cancer Registration

Cancer Registration

Author: Ole Møller Jensen

Publisher: IARC

Published: 1991

Total Pages: 295

ISBN-13: 9283211952

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Data obtained by population based cancer registries have a pivotal role in cancer control. Now also available in Spanish and French, this volume, which contains 15 authored chapters and four useful appendices, remains a standard reference for those planning to establish new cancer registries and those keen to adopt recognized methodologies. Information is given on the techniques required to collect, store, analyse and interpret data.


Report of the Second Workshop on Age-Adjustment

Report of the Second Workshop on Age-Adjustment

Author: Workshop on Age-Adjustment

Publisher: Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Servic

Published: 1998

Total Pages: 48

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"This report contains a summary of the Second Workshop on Age-Adjustment held at the National Center for Health Statistics on June 5-6, 1997. The Second Workshop was held as a follow up to the First Workshop held in 1991 to consider changing the standard used for age-adjusting death rates and to develop and implementation plan"--P. 1.


Summary Measures of Population Health

Summary Measures of Population Health

Author: World Health Organization

Publisher: World Health Organization

Published: 2002

Total Pages: 816

ISBN-13: 9789241545518

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

As life expectancy rates continue to increase in many countries around the world, comparative health assessments based on mortality rates alone give an increasingly inadequate picture of public health. This publication addresses a wide range of key issues regarding the measurement of population health using comprehensive indices which combine data on mortality and ill-health. It considers the various uses of such summary measures, as well as an appropriate measurement framework and specific ethical and social value choices involved. The contributors to this book include leading experts in epidemiological methods, ethics, health economics, health status measurement and the valuation of health states.


Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries

Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2011-06-27

Total Pages: 200

ISBN-13: 0309217105

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

During the last 25 years, life expectancy at age 50 in the United States has been rising, but at a slower pace than in many other high-income countries, such as Japan and Australia. This difference is particularly notable given that the United States spends more on health care than any other nation. Concerned about this divergence, the National Institute on Aging asked the National Research Council to examine evidence on its possible causes. According to Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries, the nation's history of heavy smoking is a major reason why lifespans in the United States fall short of those in many other high-income nations. Evidence suggests that current obesity levels play a substantial part as well. The book reports that lack of universal access to health care in the U.S. also has increased mortality and reduced life expectancy, though this is a less significant factor for those over age 65 because of Medicare access. For the main causes of death at older ages-cancer and cardiovascular disease-available indicators do not suggest that the U.S. health care system is failing to prevent deaths that would be averted elsewhere. In fact, cancer detection and survival appear to be better in the U.S. than in most other high-income nations, and survival rates following a heart attack also are favorable. Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries identifies many gaps in research. For instance, while lung cancer deaths are a reliable marker of the damage from smoking, no clear-cut marker exists for obesity, physical inactivity, social integration, or other risks considered in this book. Moreover, evaluation of these risk factors is based on observational studies, which-unlike randomized controlled trials-are subject to many biases.