Research Emphases for the U.S. Antarctic Program

Research Emphases for the U.S. Antarctic Program

Author: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.). Polar Research Board

Publisher:

Published: 1983

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Identifies small set of major scientific questions of outstanding importance in Antarctic research, recommends priorities among them as a guide to program planning, and suggests variety of research projects through which questions could be addressed. Synthesis of role of U.S. Antarctic Research Program.


Research Emphases for the U.S. Antarctic Program

Research Emphases for the U.S. Antarctic Program

Author: National Research Council (U.S.). Polar Research Board

Publisher: National Academies

Published: 1983

Total Pages: 64

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Identifies small set of major scientific questions of outstanding importance in Antarctic research, recommends priorities among them as a guide to program planning, and suggests variety of research projects through which questions could be addressed. Synthesis of role of U.S. Antarctic Research Program.


U.S. Research in Antarctica in 2000 A.D. and Beyond

U.S. Research in Antarctica in 2000 A.D. and Beyond

Author: National Research Council (U.S.). Polar Research Board

Publisher: Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press

Published: 1986

Total Pages: 46

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Outlines major considerations related to research priorities for U.S. science in Antarctic during twenty-first century. Sections include: an optimal scientific program, summary of logistics needs in Antarctica in 2000 A.D. and beyond, and policy matters.


The United States in Antarctica

The United States in Antarctica

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1997

Total Pages: 112

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"This document represents the final report of the United States Antarctic Program External Panel. The report has the unanimous approval of all 11 panel members and draws upon our collective experience which includes some 44 individual trips to Antarctica involving visits to all three U. S. stations, each research ship, support icebreakers and numerous field sites. As a panel, we visited McMurdo Station and South Pole Station and toured support facilities at Christchurch. We received approximately 70 briefings and conducted 80 “one-on-one” meetings with individuals involved in virtually all aspects of the Antarctic Program. Over 200 inputs were received in response to our request for “public comments". During visits to McMurdo and the Pole, the Panel conducted informal “Town Meetings” and was the beneficiary of numerous comments by members of those communities having first-hand experience in day-to-day operations. We are most appreciative of the candor and professionalism with which we were treated by all those with whom we came into contact, and in particular the members of the National Science Foundation who so expertly and constructively supported our efforts. We believe the U. S. Antarctic Program is well managed, involves high quality science and is important to the region as well as to the United States. We also believe that in the current budget environment, costs must be reduced, preferably through increased efficiency and “reinvention,” but, if not, through reduced scope. Recommendations are offered herein to help ensure the continued viability of the program into the 21st century."--