Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Pipelines Inc
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Pipelines Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2005

Total Pages: 44

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This report presents the reasons for decision in the matter of 2 applications filed by Enbridge Pipelines Inc. for non-routine adjustments (NRAs) to tolls. The Spearhead NRA is intended to provide financial support to an initiative to extend service into the Cushing, Oklahoma area. The 20" Reversal NRA is to provide financial support to an initiative to extend service into the United States Gulf Coast. The report summarizes submissions by Enbridge, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Mobil Pipe Line Company, Terasen Pipelines Inc., Flint Hills Resources, and other parties, and presents the views and the decisions of the Board.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Line 4 Extension Project
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Line 4 Extension Project

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 29 June 2007, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. applied to the National Energy Board (NEB) for approvals related to the proposed Line 4 Extension Project. The purpose of the applied-for project is to extend Line 4 upstream from Hardisty to Edmonton. This document presents the decision of the National Energy Board regarding Enbridge Pipeline's application for these approvals.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc., on Behalf of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Limited Partnership
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc., on Behalf of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Limited Partnership

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 138

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Having considered and weighed all of the evidence before it, the National Energy Board (NEB or the Board) finds that the Bakken Pipeline Project Canada (the Project), as proposed by Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc. (Enbridge Bakken), on behalf of Bakken Pipeline Limited Partnership, is and will be required by the present and future public convenience and necessity. This document includes the economic feasability, tolls and tariffs, facilities and emergency response matters, land matters, public consultation, aboriginal matters, and environmental and socio-economic matters.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 128

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In early 2008, the National Energy Board (Board or NEB) identified a proposed approach for the Land Matters Consultative Initiative (LMCI), consisting of four distinct topic streams. One of the streams, Stream 3, was Pipeline Abandonment--Financial Issues. The Board indicated that the key issue to be considered in respect of that stream was: "What is the optimal way to ensure that funds are available when abandonment costs are incurred?" The Board noted two key principles fundamental to its future decisions with respect to the financial matters related to pipeline abandonment. These were: a) Abandonment costs are a legitimate cost of providing service and are recoverable upon Board approval from users of the system; and b) Landowners will not be liable for costs of pipeline abandonment. These Reasons for Decision provide an overview of the matters considered by the Board in reaching a decision in respect of the abandonment cost estimates applications.--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP on Behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP and Enbridge Pipelines Inc
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP on Behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP and Enbridge Pipelines Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 186

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 9 March 2007, Enbridge Southern Lights GP on behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP (ESL) and Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (EPI), collectively the Applicants, applied to the National Energy Board (NEB or the Board) for approvals related to the Southern Lights Project (Project). This Project consists of two components: Diluent Pipeline Project; and Capacity Replacement Project. In this proceeding, the Board heard evidence on engineering design and safety issues; economic considerations, such as supply and markets; public engagement and consultation; impacts on Aboriginal people; socio-economic and environmental effects of the Project; and land and routing matters.--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 60

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 31 May 2010, Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc. (ESL), on behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP, and Enbridge Pipelines Inc. submitted NEB Tariff No. 1 and NEB Tariff No. 2 for service on the Southern Lights Pipeline to the National Energy Board (NEB). The Tariffs became effective on 1 July 2010, the pipeline's planned in-service date. Tariff No. 1 set out the rules and regulations and Tariff No. 2 established the toll for service (ESL Toll) on the line. In Tariff No. 2, the toll for uncommitted service (Uncommitted Toll) is twice the toll for committed service (Committed Toll). On 1 September 2010, Imperial Oil Limited submitted a complaint with respect to the ESL Toll. This report details the complaint filed by Imperial Oil, and presents the NEB's consideration of the market context and the justness of the Uncommitted Toll.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher: Board

Published: 2007

Total Pages: 130

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. The Board is an independent tribunal with responsibilities for regulating the oil, gas, and electricity industries. Its decisions affect the industry, energy consumers, and anyone who owns land or lives in the vicinity of pipeline and international power line rights of way. Its decisions aim to protect the public interest in safety, environmental protection, and economic efficiency. This document presents the decision of the National Energy Board regarding TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd.'s application to construct and operate the Canadian portion of the Keystone pipeline project. News releases are included in English and French.--Government of Canada's website.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 60

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"In this proceeding, the Board was asked by Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC as General Partner of Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. (Trans Mountain) to consider the toll methodology, and the terms and conditions that would apply to the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline (Expanded System), if such an expansion is built in the future. The applied-for toll methodology resulted from an open season consisting of three rounds (Open Season) and is based on negotiated tolls rather than cost of service"--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Vantage Pipeline Canada ULC
Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Vantage Pipeline Canada ULC

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 156

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 7 February 2011, Vantage Pipeline Canada LLC applied to the National Energy Board (NEB), pursuant to section 52 of the NEB Act, for a Certificate to construct and operate Vantage Pipeline (Pipeline), which will carry liquid ethane from Hess Corporation's natural gas processing plant near Tioga, North Dakota, United States (U.S.) through Saskatchewan to interconnect with the Alberta Ethane Gathering System (AEGS) near Empress, Alberta (AB). This report describes the matters considered by the NEB in reaching a decision on the application. In coming to its findings, the NEB considered all of the evidence on the record in this matter including economic feasibility, Aborginal matters, land matters, environment and socio-economic matters, engineering matters, public convenience, and necessity.--Includes text from document.