Presidential Activism and Veto Power in Central and Eastern Europe

Presidential Activism and Veto Power in Central and Eastern Europe

Author: Philipp Köker

Publisher: Springer

Published: 2017-06-20

Total Pages: 306

ISBN-13: 331951914X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book examines the use of presidential powers in Central and East Europe between 1990 and 2010. Focussing on presidential vetoes and the formation of governments, it maps patterns of presidential activism and its determinants across nine democracies. Thereby, it combines the analysis of original quantitative data on the use of presidential powers with in-depth case studies in an innovative mixed-methods framework. Based on regression analyses and unique insights from numerous elite interviews, the study shows strong support for the hitherto insufficiently tested assumption that popularly elected presidents are more active than their indirectly elected counterparts. As one of the first comprehensive comparative studies of presidential activism and veto power in Europe, this book will be a key resource not only for area specialists but also for scholars of presidential studies, comparative government, and executives.


Veto Bargaining

Veto Bargaining

Author: Charles M. Cameron

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2000-06-19

Total Pages: 316

ISBN-13: 9780521625500

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Combining game theory with unprecedented data, this book analyzes how divided party Presidents use threats and vetoes to wrest policy concessions from a hostile congress.


Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy

Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy

Author: Richard Abernathy Watson

Publisher: Studies in Government and Public Policy

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 240

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An analysis of presidential vetoes from FDR to Jimmy Carter which clarifies the problems caused by the veto and reveals how it has shaped public policy, Watson concludes that the veto power has operated well both in terms of public policy and relations between Congress and the president and argues that it would be a mistake to alter it through the adoption of an item veto.