Phase 1 Archaeological Survey of Proposed Pipeline Loops

Phase 1 Archaeological Survey of Proposed Pipeline Loops

Author: Christopher D. Hohman

Publisher:

Published: 1989

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Project areas located in town of Nelson, Madison County; towns of Cambria and Lewiston, Niagara County; town of Skaneateles, Onondaga County; town of Schodack, Rensselaer County, all in New York. Project areas also reported on in PAF Report no. 194. Nelson and Schodack project areas contiguous with project areas in PAF Report no. 197. See also PAF Report no. 257.


Archaeological Survey 31BF115 and 31BF117. Phase 1. Archaeological Survey 31BF115. Phase 2. Texasgulf, Bath Creek, North Carolina

Archaeological Survey 31BF115 and 31BF117. Phase 1. Archaeological Survey 31BF115. Phase 2. Texasgulf, Bath Creek, North Carolina

Author: Ronald A. Thomas

Publisher:

Published: 1987

Total Pages: 98

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Phase I and II archaeological investigations were conducted within the Texasgulf Chemical Company project area, Beaufort County, North Carolina. Two sites were identified, 31BF115 and 31BF117. Both contained prehistoric components and 31BF115 had an historic component. Surface and subsurface prehistoric cultural material deposits, including features, were located at 31BF115. No features were found at 31BF117. In-ground historic structural remains and three possible historic burials were identified at 31BF115. The prehistoric components in the two sites have settlement histories which are primarily affiliated with the Woodland period, circa 1000 B.C. to A.D. 1650. Both of the sites were mainly inhabited during the Late Woodland period, A.D. 800 to 1650, Colington phase. The 31BF115 historic component appeared to be primarily from the eighteenth century and was associated with early residences and plantations operated near the town of Bath. 31BF115 is recommended to have cultural significance and it is considered to have potential for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Avoidance of adverse impact is recommended, or, if not possible, data recovery research should be undertaken.