Ohio River Navigation Project Operation and Maintenance
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Ohio River Division
Publisher:
Published: 1978
Total Pages: 404
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Ohio River Division
Publisher:
Published: 1978
Total Pages: 404
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Louisville District
Publisher:
Published: 1975
Total Pages: 356
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Ohio River Division
Publisher:
Published: 1978
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 324
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1986
Total Pages: 512
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1985
Total Pages: 616
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2011-11-04
Total Pages: 50
ISBN-13: 0309211328
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is responsible for construction, operations, and maintenance of much of the nation's water resources infrastructure. This infrastructure includes flood control levees, multi-purpose dams, locks, navigation channels, port and harbor facilities, and beach protection infrastructure. The Corps of Engineers also regulates the dredging and filling of wetlands subject to federal jurisdictions. Along with its programs for flood damage reduction and support of commercial navigation, ecosystem restoration was added as a primary Corps mission area in 1996. The National Research Council (NRC) Committee on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on Water Resources Science, Engineering, and Planning was convened by the NRC at the request of the Corps of Engineers to provide independent advice to the Corps on an array of strategic and planning issues. National Water Resources Challenges Facing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers surveys the key water resources challenges facing the Corps, the limits of what might be expected today from the Corps, and future prospects for the agency. This report presents several findings, but no recommendations, to the Corps of Engineers based on initial investigations and discussions with Corps leadership. National Water Resources Challenges Facing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can serve as a foundational resource for the Corps of Engineers, U.S. Congress, federal agencies, and Corps project co-sponsors, among others.
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1976
Total Pages: 418
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: U. S. Army Corps Of Engineers
Publisher:
Published: 2013
Total Pages:
ISBN-13: 9781304110763
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2001-04-30
Total Pages: 134
ISBN-13: 9780309074056
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn 1988, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began an investigation of the benefits and costs of extending several locks on the lower portion of the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway (UMR-IWW) in order to relieve increasing waterway congestion, particularly for grain moving to New Orleans for export. With passage of the Flood Control Act of 1936, Congress required that the Corps conduct a benefit-cost analysis as part of its water resources project planning; Congress will fund water resources projects only if a project's benefits exceed its costs. As economic analysis generally, and benefit-cost analysis in particular, has become more sophisticated, and as environmental and social considerations and analysis have become more important, Corps planning studies have grown in size and complexity. The difficulty in commensurating market and nonmarket costs and benefits also presents the Corps with a significant challenge. The Corps' analysis of the UMR-IWW has extended over a decade, has cost roughly $50 million, and has involved consultations with other federal agencies, state conservation agencies, and local citizens. The analysis has included many consultants and has produced dozens of reports. In February 2000, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) requested that the National Academies review the Corps' final feasibility report. After discussions and negotiations with DOD, in April 2000 the National Academies launched this review and appointed an expert committee to carry it out.