Defending Humanity

Defending Humanity

Author: George P. Fletcher

Publisher: Oxford University Press on Demand

Published: 2008-03-18

Total Pages: 285

ISBN-13: 0195183088

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Recoge: Murder among nations -- How to talk about self-defense -- A theory of legitimate defense -- The six elements of legitimate defense -- Excusing international aggression -- Humanitarian intervention -- Preemptive and preventitive wars -- The collective dimension of war.


Justifying Injustice

Justifying Injustice

Author: Herlinde Pauer-Studer

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2020-09-24

Total Pages: 283

ISBN-13: 110715930X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Examines Nazi legal theory, the normative ideas driving the Führer state and the legal subtext to the regime's escalating atrocities.


How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law

How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law

Author: Kenneth R. Westphal

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2016-04-07

Total Pages: 286

ISBN-13: 0191064122

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Kenneth R. Westphal presents an original interpretation of Hume's and Kant's moral philosophies, the differences between which are prominent in current philosophical accounts. Westphal argues that focussing on these differences, however, occludes a decisive, shared achievement: a distinctive constructivist method to identify basic moral principles and to justify their strict objectivity, without invoking moral realism nor moral anti-realism or irrealism. Their constructivism is based on Hume's key insight that 'though the laws of justice are artificial, they are not arbitrary'. Arbitrariness in basic moral principles is avoided by starting with fundamental problems of social coördination which concern outward behaviour and physiological needs; basic principles of justice are artificial because solving those problems does not require appeal to moral realism (nor to moral anti-realism). Instead, moral cognitivism is preserved by identifying sufficient justifying reasons, which can be addressed to all parties, for the minimum sufficient legitimate principles and institutions required to provide and protect basic forms of social coördination (including verbal behaviour). Hume first develops this kind of constructivism for basic property rights and for government. Kant greatly refines Hume's construction of justice within his 'metaphysical principles of justice', whilst preserving the core model of Hume's innovative constructivism. Hume's and Kant's constructivism avoids the conventionalist and relativist tendencies latent if not explicit in contemporary forms of moral constructivism.


Justifying Legal Punishment

Justifying Legal Punishment

Author: Igor Primoratz

Publisher: Prometheus Books

Published: 1997-11

Total Pages: 210

ISBN-13: 159102983X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

While the philosophy of punishment is dominated by utilitarian and "mixed" theories, this study, written in the analytic tradition but also drawing on the views of Hegel, argues for a purely retributive view: all the main questions facing a theory of punishment are answered in terms of justice and desert, without any concessions to social expediency.


Francisco de Vitoria and the Evolution of International Law

Francisco de Vitoria and the Evolution of International Law

Author: Amaya Amell

Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield

Published: 2021-03-04

Total Pages: 141

ISBN-13: 1793613354

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Francisco de Vitoria and the Evolution of International Law: Justifying Injustice is a reconstruction of the philosophical and legal theories of Fray Francisco de Vitoria, hailed by many as one of the primary founders of international law, and how these served to introduce the theory of an international community in which all nations take part, regardless of religious beliefs. The impact of the conquest of the Americas resulted in a transformation or re-articulation of the Old World’s preconceived notions of human nature and the rights of people and nations. Due to the need for a more universal principle, the theory of international law began to expand. In order to present a perspective on international law and human rights beyond the scope of the Spanish conquest of the Americas, Vitoria’s thoughts are compared to those of Hugo Grotius and John Locke, to show how the issues of natural, human, and divine law evolved through time. Their questioning of the right to invade other countries and subdue their inhabitants brought to light the conflictive relationship between colonial expansion and the law of nations and was an essential part of debates among intellectuals, jurists, and theologians in an attempt to find a way to reconcile these two often-contradictory notions.


Justifying Intellectual Property

Justifying Intellectual Property

Author: Robert P. Merges

Publisher: Harvard University Press

Published: 2011-06-13

Total Pages: 422

ISBN-13: 0674049489

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In a sophisticated defense of intellectual property, Merges draws on Kant, Locke, and Rawls to explain how IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation and make sense for a just society. He also calls for appropriate boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits.


Justifying Revolution

Justifying Revolution

Author: Glenn A. Moots

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13: 9780806160139

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"Explores how the American Revolution's opposing sides wrestled with thorny moral and legal questions with an eye to the justice and legality of entering armed conflict; the choices made by officers and soldiers in combat; and attempts to arrive at defensible terms of peace"--


The Right to Justification

The Right to Justification

Author: Rainer Forst

Publisher: Columbia University Press

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 370

ISBN-13: 0231147082

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Contemporary philosophical pluralism recognizes the inevitability and legitimacy of multiple ethical perspectives and values, making it difficult to isolate the higher-order principles on which to base a theory of justice. Rising up to meet this challenge, Rainer Forst, a leading member of the Frankfurt School's newest generation of philosophers, conceives of an "autonomous" construction of justice founded on what he calls the basic moral right to justification. Forst begins by identifying this right from the perspective of moral philosophy. Then, through an innovative, detailed critical analysis, he ties together the central components of social and political justice--freedom, democracy, equality, and toleration--and joins them to the right to justification. The resulting theory treats "justificatory power" as the central question of justice, and by adopting this approach, Forst argues, we can discursively work out, or "construct," principles of justice, especially with respect to transnational justice and human rights issues. As he builds his theory, Forst engages with the work of Anglo-American philosophers such as John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin, and Amartya Sen, and critical theorists such as Jürgen Habermas, Nancy Fraser, and Axel Honneth. Straddling multiple subjects, from politics and law to social protest and philosophical conceptions of practical reason, Forst brilliantly gathers contesting claims around a single, elastic theory of justice.


Proportionality and Constitutional Culture

Proportionality and Constitutional Culture

Author: Moshe Cohen-Eliya

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2013-06-13

Total Pages: 183

ISBN-13: 1107021863

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A comparison of proportionality, the dominant doctrine in constitutional law worldwide, with the American doctrine of balancing.


The Politics of Justifying Force

The Politics of Justifying Force

Author: Charlotte Peevers

Publisher: OUP Oxford

Published: 2013-11-07

Total Pages: 1447

ISBN-13: 0191510548

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

What are the politics involved in a government justifying its use of military force abroad? What is the role of international law in that discourse? How and why is international law crucial to this process? And what role does the media have in mediating the interaction of international law and politics? This book provides a fresh and engaging answer to these questions. It introduces different actors to the study of international law in this context, in particular highlighting the importance of institutional actors and the role of the media. It takes a theoretical approach, informed by detailed empirical analysis of key case studies, which challenges the traditional distinction between the spheres of 'the international' and 'the domestic' in global affairs, and the role of international law in the making of public policy. The book specifically critiques the idea of the 'politics of justification', which argues that deploying international legal norms to justify governmental decisions resulting in the use of force necessarily constrains government actions, and leads to fewer instances of military intervention. The politics of justification, on this account, can be seen as a progressive practice, through which international law can become embedded in domestic societies. The book investigates the actors engaged in this justification, and the institutional contexts within which legal justification is articulated, interpreted, and contested. It provides a rich, detailed account of domestic British discourse in the crucial case studies of the Suez Crisis of 1956 and the Iraq War of 2003, making extensive use of archival material, newspaper and television reporting, Parliamentary debates, polling data, personal memoirs, and the declassified material provided to several Public Inquiries, including the Chilcot Inquiry. In light of these sources, it considers the concept of international law as a language and form of communication rather than a set of abstract norms. It argues that a detailed understanding of how that language is deployed, both in private and in public, is essential to gaining a deeper understanding of the role of international law in domestic politics. This book will be illuminating reading for scholars and students the use of force in international law, historians, and media theorists.