Read and Download eBook Full
Author: P B Medawar
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2013-04-15
Total Pages: 79
ISBN-13: 1135028257
DOWNLOAD EBOOKOriginally published in 1969. This book explains what is wrong with the traditional methodology of "inductive" reasoning and shows that the alternative scheme of reasoning associated with Whewell, Pierce and Popper can give the scientist a useful insight into the way he thinks.
Author: Peter Brian Medawar
Publisher:
Published: 1969
Total Pages: 62
ISBN-13: 9780415420297
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1972
Total Pages: 62
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Peter Brian Medawar
Publisher:
Published: 1980
Total Pages: 62
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Louis Groarke
Publisher: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP
Published: 2009-11-01
Total Pages: 528
ISBN-13: 0773575766
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn An Aristotelian Account of Induction Groarke discusses the intellectual process through which we access the "first principles" of human thought - the most basic concepts, the laws of logic, the universal claims of science and metaphysics, and the deepest moral truths. Following Aristotle and others, Groarke situates the first stirrings of human understanding in a creative capacity for discernment that precedes knowledge, even logic. Relying on a new historical study of philosophical theories of inductive reasoning from Aristotle to the twenty-first century, Groarke explains how Aristotle offers a viable solution to the so-called problem of induction, while offering new contributions to contemporary accounts of reasoning and argument and challenging the conventional wisdom about induction.
Author: P.B. Medawar
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2021-11-29
Total Pages: 119
ISBN-13: 1000466507
DOWNLOAD EBOOKFirst published in 1967, The Art of the Soluble presents collection of essays giving the views of the author on creativity and originality in science and on the logical connections between creative and critical thought. It is also a pioneering study of the ethology of the scientists – of the anatomy of scientific behaviour. Is it true that scientists are detached or dispassionate observers of Nature? What underlies the scientist’s deep concern over the matters of priority? How did a class distinction grow up between pure and applied science? By what criteria do scientists value their own and their colleagues work? Some of the answers grow out of author’s four critical studies of Teilhard de Chardin, Arthur Koestler, D’Arcy Thompson and Herbert Spencer and the book as whole is knit together by a major essay Hypothesis and Imagination, on the nature of scientific reasoning. P. B. Medawar, who won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1960, did not see science as a book-keeping of Nature but, on the contrary, as the greatest of human adventures. This book will be an essential read for scholars and researchers of philosophy of Science, natural science, and philosophy in general
Author: Peter Brian Medawar
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Published: 1984-01
Total Pages: 351
ISBN-13: 9780192830395
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: S. Radhakrishnan
Publisher: Harper Collins
Published: 2015-07-21
Total Pages: 293
ISBN-13: 9351360393
DOWNLOAD EBOOKOne of the most profoundly religious books of our time - The Spectator Science is a system of second causes, which cannot describe the world adequately, much less account for it. In this remarkable treatise, Radhakrishnan explores aspects of the modern intellectual debate on science vis-a-vis religion and the vain attempts to find a substitute for religion. He discusses, drawing upon the traditions of East and West, the nature and validity of religious experience.Finally, he creates a fine vision of mans evolution and the emergence of higher values. The range of subjects combined with the authors own faith, undogmatic and free of creed, makes this book a philosophical education in itself.
Author: Harold Himsworth
Publisher: JHU Press
Published: 2019-12-01
Total Pages: 85
ISBN-13: 1421434776
DOWNLOAD EBOOKOriginally published in 1986. Are there two kinds of problems—the scientific and the philosophic—each requiring different methods for solution? Or are there, rather, two different ways of approaching a problem, each yielding a different answer according to the method used? Biomedical researcher Sir Harold Himsworth urges scientists not to shy away from using scientific methods to grapple with problems traditionally accepted as belonging to the province of philosophy. The difference between science and philosophy lies not in the problems to which they are directed, Himsworth argues, but rather in the methods they use for solving them. To the scientist, a proposition is something to be investigated; to the philosopher, something to be accepted as a basis for thought. Since the development of the scientific method, substantial progress has been made toward mastering problems in the natural environment. If we are ever to attain a degree of control over problems that derive from human activities, Himsworth claims that we only succeed by approaching them in a comparably objective way.
Author: James Ladyman
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2012-08-06
Total Pages: 312
ISBN-13: 1134597908
DOWNLOAD EBOOKFew can imagine a world without telephones or televisions; many depend on computers and the Internet as part of daily life. Without scientific theory, these developments would not have been possible. In this exceptionally clear and engaging introduction to philosophy of science, James Ladyman explores the philosophical questions that arise when we reflect on the nature of the scientific method and the knowledge it produces. He discusses whether fundamental philosophical questions about knowledge and reality might be answered by science, and considers in detail the debate between realists and antirealists about the extent of scientific knowledge. Along the way, central topics in philosophy of science, such as the demarcation of science from non-science, induction, confirmation and falsification, the relationship between theory and observation and relativism are all addressed. Important and complex current debates over underdetermination, inference to the best explaination and the implications of radical theory change are clarified and clearly explained for those new to the subject.
