Impeachment Trial Committee on the Articles Against Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr: part A-C (3 v.)
Author: G. Thomas Porteous (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 2010
Total Pages: 808
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: G. Thomas Porteous (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 2010
Total Pages: 808
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Elizabeth Rybicki
Publisher:
Published: 2020
Total Pages: 25
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Office of White House Counsel
Publisher:
Published: 2020-01-20
Total Pages: 186
ISBN-13: 9781680923209
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThis is a printed copy of the "Trial Memorandum Of President Donald J. Trump In Proceedings Before The United States Senate" as produced by the Office of White House Counsel in the Impeachment proceedings before the United States Senate. The Articles of Impeachment now before the Senate are an affront to the Constitution and to our democratic institutions. The Articles themselves--and the rigged process that brought them here--are a brazenly political act by House Democrats that must be rejected. They debase the grave power of impeachment and disdain the solemn responsibility that power entails. Anyone having the most basic respect for the sovereign will of the American people would shudder at the enormity of casting a vote to impeach a duly elected President. By contrast, upon tallying their votes, House Democrats jeered until they were scolded into silence by the Speaker. The process that brought the articles here violated every precedent and every principle of fairness followed in impeachment inquiries for more than 150 years. Even so, all that House Democrats have succeeded in proving is that the President did absolutely nothing wrong.
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1862
Total Pages: 13
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: G. Thomas Porteous (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 2010
Total Pages: 1340
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Michael J. Gerhardt
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Published: 2000-06-15
Total Pages: 284
ISBN-13: 9780226289571
DOWNLOAD EBOOKMichael Gerhard examines the likely political and constitutional consequences of President Clinton's impeachment and trial. Placing the President's acquittal in historical perspective he argues that it is consistent with the process as it has evolved over the last two centuries.
Author: G. Thomas Porteous (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 2010
Total Pages: 388
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Rigby
Publisher:
Published: 2006
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13: 9781418914219
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Valerie Heitshusen
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Published: 2017-04-15
Total Pages: 28
ISBN-13: 9781545390382
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe filibuster is widely viewed as one of the Senate's most characteristic procedural features. Filibustering includes any use of dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a measure by preventing it from coming to a vote. The possibility of filibusters exists because Senate rules place few limits on Senators' rights and opportunities in the legislative process. In particular, a Senator who seeks recognition usually has a right to the floor if no other Senator is speaking, and then that Senator may speak for as long as he or she wishes. Also, there is no motion by which a simple majority of the Senate can stop a debate and allow itself to vote in favor of an amendment, a bill or resolution, or most other debatable questions. Most bills, indeed, are potentially subject to at least two filibusters before the Senate votes on final passage: first, a filibuster on a motion to proceed to the bill's consideration and, second, after the Senate agrees to this motion, a filibuster on the bill itself. Senate Rule XXII, however, known as the cloture rule, enables Senators to end a filibuster on any debatable matter the Senate is considering. Sixteen Senators initiate this process by presenting a motion to end the debate. In most circumstances, the Senate does not vote on this cloture motion until the second day of session after the motion is made. Then, it requires the votes of at least three-fifths of all Senators, i.e. 60 votes, to invoke cloture. Invoking cloture on a proposal to amend the Senate's standing rules requires the support of two-thirds of the Senators present and voting, whereas cloture on nominations requires a numerical majority. The primary effect of invoking cloture on most questions is to impose a maximum of 30 additional hours for considering that question. This 30-hour period for consideration encompasses all time consumed by roll call votes, quorum calls, and other actions, as well as the time used for debate. Under cloture, as well, the only amendments Senators can offer are ones that are germane and were submitted in writing before the cloture vote took place. Finally, the presiding officer also enjoys certain additional powers under cloture such as, for example, the power to count to determine whether a quorum is present and to rule amendments, motions, and other actions out of order on the grounds that they are dilatory. The ability of Senators to engage in filibusters has a profound and pervasive effect on how the Senate conducts its business on the floor. In the face of a threatened filibuster, for example, the majority leader may decide not to call a bill up for floor consideration or may defer calling it up if there are other, equally important bills the Senate can consider and pass with less delay. Similarly, the prospect of a filibuster can persuade a bill's proponents to accept changes in the bill that they do not support but that are necessary to prevent an actual filibuster. This report concentrates on the operation of cloture under the general provisions of Senate Rule XXII, paragraph 2, though it also identifies key modifications to its application in recent years. This report will be updated as events warrant.
Author: G. Thomas Porteous (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 2010
Total Pages: 1156
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK