Max-min Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Max-min Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Author: Daniel Golovin

Publisher:

Published: 2005

Total Pages: 20

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Abstract: "We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of m indivisible goods to n agents, given the agents' utilities for each good. Fair allocations in this context are those maximizing the minimum utility received by any agent. We give hardness results and polynomial time approximation algorithms for several variants of this problem. Our main result is a bicriteria approximation in the model with additive utilities, in which a (1 - 1/k) fraction of the agents receive utility at least OPT/k, for any integer k. This result is obtained from rounding a suitable linear programming relaxation of the problem, and is the best possible result for our LP. We also give an O([square root of n]) approximation for a special case with only two classes of goods, an (m - n + 1) approximation for instances with submodular utilities, and extreme inapproximability results for the most general model with monotone utilities."


Efficiency and Fairness in the Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Efficiency and Fairness in the Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Author: Akina Ikudo

Publisher:

Published: 2021

Total Pages: 147

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This dissertation studies the efficient and fair allocation of indivisible goods without monetary transfer. It is a collection of three papers and uses school-choice programs as a motivating example. I provide theoretical results that can guide the design of new allocation systems as well as tools that can be used to enhance existing systems. In Chapter 1, I analyze how information disclosure affects social welfare using a stylized model. In my model, the utility of agents consists of a vertical "quality" component and a horizontal "idiosyncratic taste" component. The exact qualities of the objects are unknown to the agents, and the social planner seeks an information-disclosure policy that will maximize the total utility. The results show that (1) the optimal disclosure policy hides small differences in quality and reveals large differences in quality, (2) more information is disclosed when the valuations of the quality are heterogeneous, and (3) the Immediate Acceptance mechanism is more conducive for information disclosure than the Deferred Acceptance mechanism. In Chapter 2, I study the collocation of groups of students in school-choice programs. In particular, I examine when and how stochastic assignment matrices can be decomposed into lotteries over deterministic assignments subject to collocation constraints. I first show that---regardless of the number of pairs of twins in the student body---twin collocation can be maintained in a decomposition if one extra seat can be added to each school. I then propose a decomposition algorithm based on Column Generation that can incorporate a wide variety of constraints including collocation constraints. In Chapter 3, I propose a new notion of fairness that combines the concept of rank values and the maximin principle. An assignment is rank-egalitarian undominated (REU) if there is no other assignment that is equally or more egalitarian for any set of rank values. I show that each REU assignment can be generated as a solution to a linear programming problem that maximizes the weighted sum of expected rank values of the worst-off agents. I also provide an algorithm that generates special subsets of REU assignments that are practically important.


Fair Division

Fair Division

Author: Steven J. Brams

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 1996-02-23

Total Pages: 292

ISBN-13: 9780521556446

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Cutting a cake, dividing up the property in an estate, determining the borders in an international dispute - such problems of fair division are ubiquitous. Fair Division treats all these problems and many more through a rigorous analysis of a variety of procedures for allocating goods (or 'bads' like chores), or deciding who wins on what issues, when there are disputes. Starting with an analysis of the well-known cake-cutting procedure, 'I cut, you choose', the authors show how it has been adapted in a number of fields and then analyze fair-division procedures applicable to situations in which there are more than two parties, or there is more than one good to be divided. In particular they focus on procedures which provide 'envy-free' allocations, in which everybody thinks he or she has received the largest portion and hence does not envy anybody else. They also discuss the fairness of different auction and election procedures.


Handbook of Computational Social Choice

Handbook of Computational Social Choice

Author: Felix Brandt

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2016-04-25

Total Pages: 553

ISBN-13: 1316489752

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The rapidly growing field of computational social choice, at the intersection of computer science and economics, deals with the computational aspects of collective decision making. This handbook, written by thirty-six prominent members of the computational social choice community, covers the field comprehensively. Chapters devoted to each of the field's major themes offer detailed introductions. Topics include voting theory (such as the computational complexity of winner determination and manipulation in elections), fair allocation (such as algorithms for dividing divisible and indivisible goods), coalition formation (such as matching and hedonic games), and many more. Graduate students, researchers, and professionals in computer science, economics, mathematics, political science, and philosophy will benefit from this accessible and self-contained book.


Fair Division and Collective Welfare

Fair Division and Collective Welfare

Author: Herve Moulin

Publisher: MIT Press

Published: 2004-08-20

Total Pages: 302

ISBN-13: 9780262633116

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The concept of fair division is as old as civil society itself. Aristotle's "equal treatment of equals" was the first step toward a formal definition of distributive fairness. The concept of collective welfare, more than two centuries old, is a pillar of modern economic analysis. Reflecting fifty years of research, this book examines the contribution of modern microeconomic thinking to distributive justice. Taking the modern axiomatic approach, it compares normative arguments of distributive justice and their relation to efficiency and collective welfare. The book begins with the epistemological status of the axiomatic approach and the four classic principles of distributive justice: compensation, reward, exogenous rights, and fitness. It then presents the simple ideas of equal gains, equal losses, and proportional gains and losses. The book discusses three cardinal interpretations of collective welfare: Bentham's "utilitarian" proposal to maximize the sum of individual utilities, the Nash product, and the egalitarian leximin ordering. It also discusses the two main ordinal definitions of collective welfare: the majority relation and the Borda scoring method. The Shapley value is the single most important contribution of game theory to distributive justice. A formula to divide jointly produced costs or benefits fairly, it is especially useful when the pattern of externalities renders useless the simple ideas of equality and proportionality. The book ends with two versatile methods for dividing commodities efficiently and fairly when only ordinal preferences matter: competitive equilibrium with equal incomes and egalitarian equivalence. The book contains a wealth of empirical examples and exercises.