Evaluation of the Labour Market Development Agreements
Evaluation of the Labour Market Development Agreements

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2017

Total Pages: 77

ISBN-13: 9780660093024

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) worked jointly with 12 Provinces and Territories (P/Ts) to undertake the 2012-2017 second cycle for the Labour Market Development Agreement (LMDA) evaluation. The first cycle of LMDA evaluation was carried out between 1998 and 2012 and involved the conduct of bilateral formative and summative evaluations in all P/Ts. Under the second cycle, the evaluation work consisted of conducting two to three studies per year on the Employment Benefits and Support Measures (EBSMs) similar programming delivered under these agreements. The studies generated evaluation evidence on the effectiveness, efficiency and design/delivery of EBSMs for Canada overall and for the twelve P/Ts that opted for a joint evaluation process with Canada. Under LMDAs, Canada transfers $2.14B in Employment Insurance (EI) Part II funds to P/Ts for the design and delivery of programs and services to help unemployed individuals, mainly eligible under EI, to find and maintain employment"--Introd., p. vi.

Evaluation of the Canada - Manitoba Labour Market Development Agreement
Evaluation of the Canada - Manitoba Labour Market Development Agreement

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages: 67

ISBN-13: 9780660267241

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) worked jointly with Manitoba and eleven other Provinces and Territories (P/Ts) between 2012 and 2017 to undertake the second cycle for the evaluation of the Labour Market Development Agreements (LMDAs). This report presents a summary of the findings from nine studies produced for Manitoba, which used a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods to examine issues related to program effectiveness, efficiency and design/delivery. Results are presented by type of EBSM for active and former employment insurance (EI) claimants as well as for long-tenured workers, youth (under 30 years old) and older workers (55 years old and over) when the number of participants was sufficient to conduct quantitative analyses.--Document.