Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs - Clark Hill Lake Project

Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs - Clark Hill Lake Project

Author: Clark Hill

Publisher:

Published: 1977

Total Pages: 73

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Clark Hill Lake received COngressional authorization in 1944 to provide power, flood control and navigation benefits. Post-authorization planning recommendations regarding the project-related fish and wildlife resources were developed by the state and federal wildlife agencies in 1945-1946. These recommendations were submitted in one of the first River Basin Studies Reports. The report was released by the FWS (Fish and Wildlife Statistics) in 1946. Many deficiencies were apparent in this early attempt at interagency cooperative planning for fish and wildlife. Coordination between agencies was woefully inadequate. Consideration of several important impacts of project development on these resources were omitted in the 1946 report. An unusually large acreage was acquired by the construction agency incidental to authorized project purposes. The impacts of this acquisition plan on wildlife resources were inadequately quantified. Major errors in estimating post-project fish and wildlife resources also occurred. Deer and turkey populations were not expected to develop after project construction due to a lack of suitable habitat. However, reforestation of much of the southeast, including the project area, dramatically altered the wildlife habitat and project lands presently support populations estimated at 3,140 deer and 735 turkey. The methods used to develop upland game and fur animal impact predictions, based on sound concepts of carrying capacity and harvestable surplus, were considered satisfactory.


Fish and wildlife miscellaneous

Fish and wildlife miscellaneous

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment

Publisher:

Published: 1984

Total Pages: 376

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs, Allegheny Reservoir Project, Pennsylvania

Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs, Allegheny Reservoir Project, Pennsylvania

Author: SPORT FISHING INST WASHINGTON DC.

Publisher:

Published: 1982

Total Pages: 164

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Fish and wildlife resource related aspects of the Allegheny Lake project, which is located on the Allegheny River in northwestern Pennsylvania and southwestern New York, were initially described in an August, 1958 Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) report. Information presented in this detailed FWS report was used extensively to document the subsequently issued May 9, 1961 FWS final letter report and May 9, 1961 FWS substantiating report.


Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs - Lake Sharpe Reservoir

Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife at Corps of Engineers Reservoirs - Lake Sharpe Reservoir

Author: SPORT FISHING INST WASHINGTON D C.

Publisher:

Published: 1976

Total Pages: 79

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Lake Sharpe was authorized in 1944 as part of the Pick-Sloan plan for the comprehensive development of the Missouri River Basin. The dam is located near Pierre, South Dakota. The existing project totals 32,353 ha including a 22,582 ha conservation pool. Implementation of the FWS's land acquisition plan for wildlife mitigation was encumbered by the location and extent of Indian lands and the unwillingness of the Indians to sell. Land acquisition was further handicapped by procedural disagreements between the State and the construction agency. As a result, the 1,174 ha wildlife management area recommended by the FWS to mitigate wildlife losses was not acquired. Fish and wildlife resources associated with the project have developed incidentally to authorized project purposes. Waterfowl use of Lake Sharpe proper, and the entire four-reservoir Missouri River complex proved to be of greater magnitude than was predicted by the FWS. This has occurred in the absence of the 1,174 ha wildlife management area requested by the FWS. A complete loss of big game hunting in the vicinity of the reservoir, as predicted by the FWS, was not substantiated by the available county-by-county hunting pressure and harvest data.