New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning

New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning

Author: Mark McBride

Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing

Published: 2022-05-19

Total Pages: 361

ISBN-13: 1509937668

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This is the first book to bring together distinguished jurisprudential theorists, as well as up-and-coming scholars, to critically assess the nature of legal reasoning. The volume is divided into 3 parts: The first part, General Jurisprudence and Legal Reasoning, addresses issues at the intersection of general jurisprudence - those pertaining to the nature of law itself - and legal reasoning. The second part, Rules and Reasons, addresses two concepts central to two prominent types of theory of legal reasoning. The essays in the third and final part, Doctrine and Practice, delve into the mechanics of legal practice and doctrine, from a legal reasoning perspective.


Justice, Law, and Argument

Justice, Law, and Argument

Author: Ch. Perelman

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2012-12-06

Total Pages: 199

ISBN-13: 9400990103

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This collection contains studies on justice, juridical reasoning and argumenta tion which contributed to my ideas on the new rhetoric. My reflections on justice, from 1944 to the present day, have given rise to various studies. The ftrst of these was published in English as The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963). The others, of which several are out of print or have never previously been published, are reunited in the present volume. As justice is, for me, the prime example of a "confused notion", of a notion which, like many philosophical concepts, cannot be reduced to clarity without being distorted, one cannot treat it without recourse to the methods of reasoning analyzed by the new rhetoric. In actuality, these methods have long been put into practice by jurists. Legal reasoning is fertile ground for the study of argumentation: it is to the new rhetoric what mathematics is to formal logic and to the theory of demonstrative proof. It is important, then, that philosophers should not limit their methodologi cal studies to mathematics and the natural sciences. They must not neglect law in the search for practical reason. I hope that these essays lead to be a better understanding of how law can enrich philosophical thought. CH. P.


Reasoning with Rules

Reasoning with Rules

Author: Jaap Hage

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2013-04-17

Total Pages: 280

ISBN-13: 9401588732

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Rule-applying legal arguments are traditionally treated as a kind of syllogism. Such a treatment overlooks the fact that legal principles and rules are not statements which describe the world, but rather means by which humans impose structure on the world. Legal rules create legal consequences, they do not describe them. This has consequences for the logic of rule- and principle-applying arguments, the most important of which may be that such arguments are defeasible. This book offers an extensive analysis of the role of rules and principles in legal reasoning, which focuses on the close relationship between rules, principles, and reasons. Moreover, it describes a logical theory which assigns a central place to the notion of reasons for and against a conclusion, and which is especially suited to deal with rules and principles.


The Logic of Legal Requirements

The Logic of Legal Requirements

Author: Jordi Ferrer Beltrán

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2012-09-13

Total Pages: 434

ISBN-13: 0199661642

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Does the law contain implicit exceptions to its own rules? If so, what consequence does that have for understanding the relationship between law and morality? This collection gathers leading legal philosophers to analyse the logical structure of legal norms, advancing the understanding of the general philosophy of law.


Legal Reasoning

Legal Reasoning

Author: Martin P. Golding

Publisher: Broadview Press

Published: 2001-03-02

Total Pages: 180

ISBN-13: 9781551114224

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In a book that is a blend of text and readings, Martin P. Golding explores legal reasoning from a variety of angles—including that of judicial psychology. The primary focus, however, is on the ‘logic’ of judicial decision making. How do judges justify their decisions? What sort of arguments do they use? In what ways do they rely on legal precedent? Golding includes a wide variety of cases, as well as a brief bibliographic essay (updated for this Broadview Encore Edition).


Legal Rules and Legal Reasoning

Legal Rules and Legal Reasoning

Author: Larry Alexander

Publisher: Dartmouth Publishing Company

Published: 2000

Total Pages: 450

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This two-volume collection of essays brings together major contemporary theoretical works on freedom of speech. Volume I, begins with a theoretical overview of freedom of speech and then turns to the topics of what justifies freedom of speech and what kinds of acts raise free speech concerns. Volume II, examines the distinctions among content regulations and between content and content-neutral regulations. It also analyses the concept of the public forum, inciting and hateful speech and lastly the tension between the subsidizing activities of the affirmative state and the negative liberty of freedom of speech.