A List of Geographical Atlases in the Library of Congress: Titles 4088-5324
Author: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 816
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 816
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 170
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Philip Lee Phillips
Publisher:
Published: 1914
Total Pages: 1182
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1914
Total Pages: 1182
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 816
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAccession list of atlases received by the Library of Congress from 1909-1973. Volumes 3-6 each contain their own index.
Author: Library of Congress. Division of Maps and Charts
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 822
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: William A. Kretzschmar
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Published: 1993-09-15
Total Pages: 476
ISBN-13: 9780226452838
DOWNLOAD EBOOKWho uses "skeeter hawk," "snake doctor," and "dragonfly" to refer to the same insect? Who says "gum band" instead of "rubber band"? The answers can be found in the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States (LAMSAS), the largest single survey of regional and social differences in spoken American English. It covers the region from New York state to northern Florida and from the coastline to the borders of Ohio and Kentucky. Through interviews with nearly twelve hundred people conducted during the 1930s and 1940s, the LAMSAS mapped regional variations in vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation at a time when population movements were more limited than they are today, thus providing a unique look at the correspondence of language and settlement patterns. This handbook is an essential guide to the LAMSAS project, laying out its history and describing its scope and methodology. In addition, the handbook reveals biographical information about the informants and social histories of the communities in which they lived, including primary settlement areas of the original colonies. Dialectologists will rely on it for understanding the LAMSAS, and historians will find it valuable for its original historical research. Since much of the LAMSAS questionnaire concerns rural terms, the data collected from the interviews can pinpoint such language differences as those between areas of plantation and small-farm agriculture. For example, LAMSAS reveals that two waves of settlement through the Appalachians created two distinct speech types. Settlers coming into Georgia and other parts of the Upper South through the Shenandoah Valley and on to the western side of the mountain range had a Pennsylvania-influenced dialect, and were typically small farmers. Those who settled the Deep South in the rich lowlands and plateaus tended to be plantation farmers from Virginia and the Carolinas who retained the vocabulary and speech patterns of coastal areas. With these revealing findings, the LAMSAS represents a benchmark study of the English language, and this handbook is an indispensable guide to its riches.
Author: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1950
Total Pages: 320
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Map Division
Publisher:
Published: 1992
Total Pages: 316
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Gerald G. Eggert
Publisher: Penn State Press
Published: 2010-11-01
Total Pages: 436
ISBN-13: 0271041668
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn 1850, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, was a community like many others in the U. S., employing most of its citizens in trade and commerce. Unlike its larger neighbors, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, Harrisburg had not yet experienced firsthand the Industrial Revolution. Within a decade, however, Harrisburg boasted a cotton textile mill, two blast furnaces and several iron rolling mills, a railroad car manufactory, and a machinery plant. This burst of industrial activity naturally left its mark on the community, by within two generations most industry had left Harrisburg, and its economic base was shifting toward white-collar governmental administration and services. Harrisburg Industrializes looks at this critical episode in Harrisburg's history to discover how the coming of the factory system affected the life of the community. Eggert begins with the earliest years of Harrisburg, describing its transformation from a frontier town to a small commercial and artisanal community. He identifies the early entrepreneurs who built the banking, commercial, and transportation infrastructure, which would provide the basis for industry at mid-century. Eggert then reconstructs the development of the principal manufacturing firms from their foundings, through the expansive post-Civil War era, to the onset of deindustrialization near the end of the century. Through census and company records, he is able to follow the next generation of craftsmen and entrepreneurs as well as the new industrial workers&—many of then minorities&—who came to the city after 1850. Eggert sees Harrisburg's experience with the factory system as &"second-stage,&" or imitative, industrialization, which was typical of many, if not most, communities that developed factory production. At those relatively few industrial centers (Lowell and Pittsburgh, for example) where new technologies arose and were aggressively impose on workers, the consequences were devastating, often causing alienation, rebellion, and repression. By contrast, at secondary centers like Harrisburg (or Reading, Scranton, or Wilmington), industrialization came later, was derivative rather than creative, was modest in scale, and focused on local and regional markets. Because the new factories did not compete with local crafts, few displaced artisans became factory hands. At the same time, an adequate supply of local native-born workers forestalled an influx of immigrants, so Harrisburg experienced little ethnic hostility. Ultimately, therefore, Eggert concludes that the introduction of an industrial order was much less disruptive in Harrisburg than in the major industrial sites, primarily because it did not alter so profoundly the existing economic and social order.