Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr

Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary

Publisher:

Published: 1969

Total Pages: 782

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Considers nomination of Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr. to be Associate Justice of Supreme Court. Includes discussion of Judge Haynsworth's record on civil rights and labor cases. Focuses on the propriety of Judge Haynsworth's hearing cases in which he allegedly had a financial interest, most notably the case of Darlington Manufacturing Co. vs. the National Labor Relations Board, in which Darlington Mills had business ties with the Carolina Vend-A-Matic Co., in which Judge Haynsworth was a principal stockholder.


The Rehnquist Choice

The Rehnquist Choice

Author: John W. Dean

Publisher: Simon and Schuster

Published: 2002-02-01

Total Pages: 342

ISBN-13: 0743229797

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The explosive, never-before-revealed story of how William Rehnquist became a Supreme Court Justice, told by the man responsible for his candidacy.


Citizen Rauh

Citizen Rauh

Author: Michael E. Parrish

Publisher: University of Michigan Press

Published: 2010-08-11

Total Pages: 354

ISBN-13: 0472117378

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The first published biography of a key figure in 20th-century American liberalism


To Face Down Dixie

To Face Down Dixie

Author: James O. Heath

Publisher: LSU Press

Published: 2017-12-14

Total Pages: 406

ISBN-13: 0807168386

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In an era during which the United States Supreme Court handed down some of its most important decisions, including Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Baker v. Carr (1962), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), three senators from South Carolina—Olin Johnston, Strom Thurmond, and Ernest “Fritz” Hollings—waged war on the court’s progressive agenda by targeting the federal judicial nominations process. To Face Down Dixie explores these senators’ role in some of the most contentious confirmation battles in recent history, including those of Thurgood Marshall, Abe Fortas, and Clement Haynsworth. In scrutinizing Supreme Court nominees and attempting to restrict the power of the nine justices of the court, these senators defied not only the leadership of the Democratic Party but also the Senate traditions of hierarchy and seniority. Along with South Carolina’s conservative, segregationist political establishment, which maintained ironclad control over the state’s legislature, Johnston, Thurmond, and Hollings effectively drowned out the many moderate voices in South Carolina that remained critical of their obstructionism, thus advancing their own conservative credentials and boosting their chances of reelection. To Face Down Dixie examines for the first time the central role that South Carolina played in turning Supreme Court nomination hearings into confrontational and political public events. James O. Heath argues that the state’s war on the court concealed its antipathy to civil rights by using the confirmation process to challenge the court’s function as the final arbiter of policy on questions relating to law and order, obscenity, communist subversion, and school prayer. Heath’s study illustrates that while South Carolina’s history of “massive resistance” is less prominent than that of other states, its politicians acted as persistent antagonists in the complex and dramatic debates in the U.S. Senate during the era of civil rights.