Justice for All

Justice for All

Author: The Brookings Institution

Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

Published: 2012-01-01

Total Pages: 60

ISBN-13: 0815716656

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

To consider the problems of high litigation costs and delay that burden both plaintiffs and defendants, average citizens and large corporations, Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, suggested in August 1988 the formation of a working conference of natural competitors in the legal system. In response, the Brookings Institution and the Foundation for Change invited leading litigators from the plaintiffs' and defense bar; civil and women's rights, consumer, and environmental lawyers; representatives of the insurance industry; general counsels of major corporations; former judges; and law professors from throughout the United States to analyze these issues and develop a set of concrete recommendations for procedural reform. The 36 members of the working group, together with the Rand Corporation's Institute for Civil Justice, which served as a technical consultant, met at Brookings six times between September 1988 and June 1989. In conjunction with the conference, the Foundation for Change commissioned Louis Harris and Associates to conduct a major survey of over 1,000 federal trial judges and litigators on their views about procedural reform. The recommendations in this report are significant not only because they are comprehensive in scope but also because of the diverse group of individuals who stand united behind them. The report reflects a consensus that a comprehensive program for civil justice reform can be successfully implemented and that such reform can significantly reduce litigation costs and delay.


Statistical Overview of Civil Litigation in the Federal Courts

Statistical Overview of Civil Litigation in the Federal Courts

Author: Terence Dungworth

Publisher:

Published: 1990

Total Pages: 128

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This report presents a longitudinal study of filing patterns in federal district courts and of the time taken to dispose of cases in those courts. It takes as its focus private civil litigation conducted between 1971 and 1986; hence, all such cases that were terminated by the district court system during that period are included in the analysis. The study, which assesses the performance of the entire district court system and provides an in-depth examination of case processing in fast, slow, and average districts, shows that in the aggregate, private civil suits reached disposition in about the same amount of time in 1986 as in 1971, but that this measure varied considerably from district to district. A review of factors that intuitively seem likely to be associated with such time-to-disposition differences, including case mixture, processing characteristics, and resource levels, reveals that none, in fact, bears a substantial relationship to variation in disposition times. The report concludes with a consideration of further research that might shed light on the determinants of the pace of case processing.


Court Backlogs

Court Backlogs

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice

Publisher:

Published: 1983

Total Pages: 132

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts

Author: Judiciary

Publisher: Government Printing Office

Published: 2015-02-06

Total Pages: 174

ISBN-13: 9780160926372

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Contains the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure together with forms, as amended to December 1, 2014. The rules and forms have been promulgated and amended by the United States Supreme Court pursuant to law, and further amended by Acts of Congress. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern civil proceedings in the United States district courts. Their purpose is "to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. The rules and accompanying forms were first adopted by order of the Supreme Court on December 20, 1937, transmitted to Congress on January 3, 1938, and effective September 16, 1938. The Civil Rules were last amended in 2014.