Carl Zeiss AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Carl Zeiss AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Bayer AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Bayer AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Novartis AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Novartis AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


ThyssenKrupp AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

ThyssenKrupp AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


OC Oerlikon Corporation AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

OC Oerlikon Corporation AG Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


InterDigital Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

InterDigital Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Textron Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Textron Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Google Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Google Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Canon Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Canon Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Kyocera Corporation Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Kyocera Corporation Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.