Analog Devices Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Analog Devices Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Honeywell International Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Honeywell International Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Cisco Systems Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Cisco Systems Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Freescale Semiconductor Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Freescale Semiconductor Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Tessera Technologies Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Tessera Technologies Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Quanta Computer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Quanta Computer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Motorola Solutions Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Motorola Solutions Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Exxon Mobil Corporation Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Exxon Mobil Corporation Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Emerson Electric Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Emerson Electric Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Hyundai Motor Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Hyundai Motor Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.