Acts and Resolutions of Puerto Rico
Author: Puerto Rico
Publisher:
Published: 1918
Total Pages: 168
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Puerto Rico
Publisher:
Published: 1918
Total Pages: 168
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Puerto Rico
Publisher:
Published: 1918
Total Pages: 60
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Division of Documents
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 716
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Division of Documents
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 728
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Exchange and Gift Division
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 726
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKJune and Dec. issues contain listings of periodicals.
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher:
Published: 1968
Total Pages: 1324
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 2003
Total Pages: 138
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe Committee on House Administration is pleased to present this revised book on our United States Government. This publication continues to be a popular introductory guide for American citizens and those of other countries who seek a greater understanding of our heritage of democracy. The question-and-answer format covers a broad range of topics dealing with the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of our Government as well as the electoral process and the role of political parties.--Foreword.
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 2006
Total Pages: 300
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK"Formerly known as the International Citation Manual"--p. xv.
Author: United States
Publisher:
Published: 1920
Total Pages: 114
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Kevin J. Coleman
Publisher: CreateSpace
Published: 2015-01-02
Total Pages: 32
ISBN-13: 9781505554328
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe Voting Rights Act (VRA) was successfully challenged in a June 2013 case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder. The suit challenged the constitutionality of Sections 4 and 5 of the VRA, under which certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting-mostly in the South-were required to "pre-clear" changes to the election process with the Justice Department (the U.S. Attorney General) or the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The preclearance provision (Section 5) was based on a formula (Section 4) that considered voting practices and patterns in 1964, 1968, or 1972. At issue in Shelby County was whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority when it reauthorized the VRA in 2006-with the existing formula-thereby infringing on the rights of the states. In its ruling, the Court struck down Section 4 as outdated and not "grounded in current conditions." As a consequence, Section 5 is intact, but inoperable, unless or until Congress prescribes a new Section 4 formula.