Limitations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Limitations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Author: Manuel Kürschner

Publisher: GRIN Verlag

Published: 2008-07-04

Total Pages: 41

ISBN-13: 3638073300

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2008 in the subject Business economics - Banking, Stock Exchanges, Insurance, Accounting, grade: 1,3, University of Cooperative Education, language: English, abstract: The objective of this paper is to give an overview of the most important movements of the complex area of asset pricing. This will be tried by logically structuring and building up the topic from its origins, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and then over its main points of critique, in order to arrive at the different options developed by financial science that try to resolve those problematic aspects. Due to the complexity of this subject and the limited scope of this paper, obviously it will not be possible to discuss each model or movement in depth. Coherently, the aim is to point out the main thoughts of each aspect discussed. For further information, especially concerning the deeper mathematical backgrounds and derivations of the models, the author would like to refer the reader to the books mentioned in this paper. Many of those works, finance journal publications and the literature on asset pricing in general, set their focus on different parts of this paper, which again underlines the complexity in terms of scientific scope and intellectual and mathematical intricacy of this topic.


Limitations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Limitations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Author: Manuel Kürschner

Publisher: GRIN Verlag

Published: 2008-07

Total Pages: 81

ISBN-13: 3640099257

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2008 in the subject Business economics - Banking, Stock Exchanges, Insurance, Accounting, grade: 1,3, University of Cooperative Education, 31 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The objective of this paper is to give an overview of the most important movements of the complex area of asset pricing. This will be tried by logically structuring and building up the topic from its origins, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and then over its main points of critique, in order to arrive at the different options developed by financial science that try to resolve those problematic aspects. Due to the complexity of this subject and the limited scope of this paper, obviously it will not be possible to discuss each model or movement in depth. Coherently, the aim is to point out the main thoughts of each aspect discussed. For further information, especially concerning the deeper mathematical backgrounds and derivations of the models, the author would like to refer the reader to the books mentioned in this paper. Many of those works, finance journal publications and the literature on asset pricing in general, set their focus on different parts of this paper, which again underlines the complexity in terms of scientific scope and intellectual and mathematical intricacy of this topic.


CAPM-Based Capital Budgeting and Nonadditivity

CAPM-Based Capital Budgeting and Nonadditivity

Author: Carlo Alberto Magni

Publisher:

Published: 2009

Total Pages: 15

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This paper deals with the CAPM-derived capital budgeting criterion, and in particular with Rubinstein's (1973) criterion, according to which a project is profitable if the project rate of return is greater than the risk-adjusted cost of capital, where the latter depends on the project's disequilibrium systematic risk. It is shown that the disequilibrium net present value implied by this criterion, widely used in corporate finance, is nonadditive. Four proofs are provided: (i) a counterexample taken from Copeland and Weston (1988), (ii) a modus-tollens argument showing that this notion of NPV is incompatible with additivity, (iii) a formalization showing that this NPV does not fulfil the principle of description invariance (iv) an example showing that CAPM-minded evaluators may incur arbitrage losses. The disequilibrium NPV should therefore be dismissed in investment decisions and valuations.