Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Focused Feasibility Study for Operable Unit Three

Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Focused Feasibility Study for Operable Unit Three

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1997

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Operable Unit 3 (OU3) at the Woodbridge Research Facility (WRF) has been defined as the Main Ditch (AREE 22) and the area between the northern boundary of the Main Compound and the Main Ditch (portions of AREEs 11 and 17). This report summarizes the site history, current conditions, and environmental data associated with OU3. Human Health and Ecological Risk assessments are presented. General response actions, technology types, and process options appropriate for the remediation of sediment are identified as well as proposed elements for the implementation of institutional controls for the OU. Process options are screened and assembled into six alternatives. Each alternative is evaluated in detail using the nine criteria identified in the NCP (40 CFR 300.430(e)). The report concludes with a comparison of the remedial options under consideration.


Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Focused Feasibility Study for Operable Unit One

Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Focused Feasibility Study for Operable Unit One

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1997

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Operable Unit One (OUl) at the Woodbridge Research Facility (WRF) has been defined as the area encompassing AREEs 1 through 6B (former dumps) and AREE 7 (former Pistol Range). A Focused Feasibility Study, has been conducted to identify and screen remedial alternatives for OUl, to address, contaminated groundwater, surface soil, subsurface soil, and sediment detected at AREEs associated with OU1. This report summarizes the history, current conditions, and environmental data. Human health and ecological risk assessments are presented. General response actions, technology types, and process options appropriate for the remediation of contaminated media are identified. Process options are screened and assembled into five alternatives. Each alternative is evaluated in detail using the nine criteria identified in the NCP (40 CFR 300.430(e)). The report concludes with a comparison, of the remedial options under consideration.


Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Remedial Investigation, Volume 1 - Text, Tables, and Figures

Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; Remedial Investigation, Volume 1 - Text, Tables, and Figures

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1997

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

RThe U.S. Army Woodbridge Research Facility (WRF) was used in the past as a major military communications center and a research and development laboratory where electromagnetic pulse energy was tested on military and other equipment. WRF is presently an inactive facility pursuant to the 1991 Base Realignment and Closure list. Past investigation activities indicate that polychlorinated biphenyl compounds (PCBs) are the primary chemicals of concern. A Remedial Investigation (RI) was performed to evaluate the nature and extent of contamination at WRF. Surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water/sediment, and storm water runoff samples were collected as part of the RI. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed and sampled to evaluate the quality of groundwater at WRF. A conceptual hydrogeologic model was developed using water levels obtained from the monitoring wells. A wetland delineation was performed to map the wetland areas of WRF. Human health and ecological risk assessments were performed to evaluate the potential risk to human and ecological receptors from exposures to chemicals present at WRF.


Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Health and Safety Plan

Woodbridge Research Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Health and Safety Plan

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1995

Total Pages: 100

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The requirements set forth in 29 CFR 1910.120(f), shall be met for all employees performing or supervising hazardous waste operations. Medical exams shall be conducted as soon as possible upon notification by an employee that he/she has developed signs or symptoms indicating possible health hazards or overexposure to hazardous substances. Subcontractor personnel shall provide documentation of current status of participation in a medical surveillance program as required by 29 CFR 1910.120(f). Subcontractors unable to provide such documentation shall have successfully completed a medical examination as described in the above referenced OSHA standard prior to beginning work in a contaminated zone. Specific protocols for medical examinations are designed by an occupational physician. Common components include: (a) medical history and physical examination; (b) dipstick urinalysis, vision screen and vital signs; (c) spirometry ;(d) audiometry; (e) blood chemistry (complete blood count, liver function, kidney function, lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism); (f) resting EkG (with approval); (g) chest radiograph (P/A). No project-specific medical examinations, or biological monitoring is required for this project.


Remedial Investigation/feasibility Study Work Plan and Addenda for Operable Unit 4-12

Remedial Investigation/feasibility Study Work Plan and Addenda for Operable Unit 4-12

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 1148

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This document is divided into two main sections -- the Work Plan and the addenda. The Work Plan describes the regulatory history and physical setting of Operable Unit 4-12, previous sampling activities, and data. It also identifies a preliminary conceptual model, preliminary remedial action alternatives, and preliminary applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements. In addition, the Work Plan discusses data gaps and data quality objectives for proposed remedial investigation activities. Also included are tasks identified for the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and a schedule of RI/FS activities. The addenda include details of the proposed field activities (Field Sampling Plan), anticipated quality assurance activities (Quality Assurance Project Plan), policies and procedures to protect RI/FS workers and the environment during field investigations (Health and Safety Plan), and policies, procedures, and activities that the Department of Energy will use to involve the public in the decision-making process concerning CFA Landfills II and III RI/FS activities (Community Relations Plan).