United States of America V. Somers
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 126
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 126
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1983
Total Pages: 60
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1972
Total Pages: 54
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1975
Total Pages: 70
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1977
Total Pages: 242
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 36
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
Published: 1986
Total Pages: 1188
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Department of the Interior
Publisher:
Published: 1978
Total Pages: 990
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Fred Block
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Published: 2014-04-30
Total Pages: 311
ISBN-13: 0674050711
DOWNLOAD EBOOKWhat is it about free-market ideas that give them tenacious staying power in the face of such manifest failures as persistent unemployment, widening inequality, and the severe financial crises that have stressed Western economies over the past forty years? Fred Block and Margaret Somers extend the work of the great political economist Karl Polanyi to explain why these ideas have revived from disrepute in the wake of the Great Depression and World War II, to become the dominant economic ideology of our time. Polanyi contends that the free market championed by market liberals never actually existed. While markets are essential to enable individual choice, they cannot be self-regulating because they require ongoing state action. Furthermore, they cannot by themselves provide such necessities of social existence as education, health care, social and personal security, and the right to earn a livelihood. When these public goods are subjected to market principles, social life is threatened and major crises ensue. Despite these theoretical flaws, market principles are powerfully seductive because they promise to diminish the role of politics in civic and social life. Because politics entails coercion and unsatisfying compromises among groups with deep conflicts, the wish to narrow its scope is understandable. But like Marx's theory that communism will lead to a "withering away of the State," the ideology that free markets can replace government is just as utopian and dangerous.
Author: Robert A. Katzmann
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2014-08-14
Total Pages: 184
ISBN-13: 0199362149
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.