Dimensions of Airman Morale

Dimensions of Airman Morale

Author: Edward E. Cureton

Publisher:

Published: 1960

Total Pages: 86

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In an attempt to determine and measure aspects of airman morale, 167 questionnaire items were assembled and administered to a thousand airmen. By cluster and factor-analytic techniques, eight scales were derived, one of them defined as a measure of General Morale. Three of the scales are independent of each other, but closely related to the General Morale Scale; satisfaction with the Air Force as a whole, with Management and Communication, and with the Unit and its Leadership. The remaining four scales are relatively independent of all other scales.


AFHRL-TR.

AFHRL-TR.

Author: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory

Publisher:

Published: 1968

Total Pages: 754

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


ASD Technical Note

ASD Technical Note

Author: United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division

Publisher:

Published: 1961

Total Pages: 16

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Morale Level as a Function of the Subject's Own Definition of Morale

Morale Level as a Function of the Subject's Own Definition of Morale

Author: Rosalie K. Ambler

Publisher:

Published: 1966

Total Pages: 20

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

It was hypothesized that morale level as measured by a self-rating scale would vary as a function of the subject's own definition of morale. During the week of their graduation from training, 560 Naval aviation trainees were administered an anonymous questionnaire that, among other things, asked them to give their own definition of morale. They were then instructed to note the morale of their own group in advanced training on a ten-point scale with their own definition as a frame of reference. A content analysis of the definitions was made, and three definition areas were identified. These can be described briefly as task oriented, group oriented, and feeling oriented. Mean morale rates were obtained for the subjects falling in each of the definition categories. Significant differences among this array of means were demonstrated. The task oriented group yielded the highest mean, with group oriented and feeling oriented following in that order. Hypotheses for further study were developed. (Author)