The Impact of Voluntary Adoption of IFRS on the Earning Quality and the Cost of Capital

The Impact of Voluntary Adoption of IFRS on the Earning Quality and the Cost of Capital

Author: Dalia Ezzat

Publisher:

Published: 2018

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The objective of this research is to investigate the direct relationship between the voluntary adoption of IFRS and cost of capital. Also, it investigates the indirect effect of earning quality on the voluntary adoption of IFRS and cost of capital. These relationships have been a very important issue and topic for researcher since IFRS became mandatory in EU at a beginning of 2005. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the nature of relationship between voluntary adoption of IFRS on the cost of capital and earning quality in Egypt and European firms. The sample is collected from the financial statements of 20 Egyptian and European firms as a secondary source of data. The 20 firms are classified into 10 adopting EAS in Egypt and the other 10 adopting IFRS in Europe from 2006 to 2015. The sample was from a range of industrial sectors. The results show that there is a negative relationship between voluntary adoption of IFRS and cost of capital. Costs of capital reduced in firms adopt EAS more than IFRS. Also, earning quality is not considered to be a mediator because it does not affect the relation of voluntary adoption of IFRS and cost of capital. However, there is a significant positive relationship between voluntary adoptions of IFRS on earning smoothness and accrual quality. Also, there is a negative relationship between earning quality and cost of capital.


Earnings Quality

Earnings Quality

Author: Jennifer Francis

Publisher: Now Publishers Inc

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 97

ISBN-13: 1601981147

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This review lays out a research perspective on earnings quality. We provide an overview of alternative definitions and measures of earnings quality and a discussion of research design choices encountered in earnings quality research. Throughout, we focus on a capital markets setting, as opposed, for example, to a contracting or stewardship setting. Our reason for this choice stems from the view that the capital market uses of accounting information are fundamental, in the sense of providing a basis for other uses, such as stewardship. Because resource allocations are ex ante decisions while contracting/stewardship assessments are ex post evaluations of outcomes, evidence on whether, how and to what degree earnings quality influences capital market resource allocation decisions is fundamental to understanding why and how accounting matters to investors and others, including those charged with stewardship responsibilities. Demonstrating a link between earnings quality and, for example, the costs of equity and debt capital implies a basic economic role in capital allocation decisions for accounting information; this role has only recently been documented in the accounting literature. We focus on how the precision of financial information in capturing one or more underlying valuation-relevant constructs affects the assessment and use of that information by capital market participants. We emphasize that the choice of constructs to be measured is typically contextual. Our main focus is on the precision of earnings, which we view as a summary indicator of the overall quality of financial reporting. Our intent in discussing research that evaluates the capital market effects of earnings quality is both to stimulate further research in this area and to encourage research on related topics, including, for example, the role of earnings quality in contracting and stewardship.


IFRS Adoption and Financial Reporting Quality

IFRS Adoption and Financial Reporting Quality

Author: Habeeb Mohamed Nijam

Publisher:

Published: 2016

Total Pages: 14

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Conventional and commonly held wisdom with respect to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is that they lead to improved financial reporting quality and comparability and thereby favorable economic consequences. There are however contradicting evidences disproving this conventional wisdom or rejecting its gross generalization over the entire jurisdictions harmonizing on IFRS. Driven by this fact, quests for knowledge about the dynamics and contexts that lead to differential effects of IFRS get momentum. In an attempt to explore the insight into the effects of international accounting harmonization by way of IFRS adoption, this paper reviews selected literatures on consequences of IFRS adoption. This review discusses some empirical evidences that have been reported in various countries that include Europe, USA, United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Norway, Greece, Poland, Belgian, France, Italy, Turkey, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Jordan, China, Malaysia, Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Kenya and Nigeria. Our review focuses on the aspects of value relevance, disclosure quality, cost of capital, earning management and financial statement impact due to the IFRS adoption. This review reveals that economic consequences of IFRS adoption significantly differ across jurisdictions though being its impact reported to be positive in majority of cases. There are also notable number of studies that report indifferent and or negative effects of IFRS adoption. When IFRS studies report mixed evidence with respect to value relevance of book value of equity and earing, book value of equity supersedes the earning parameters. IFRS are found to supersede many other domestic financial reporting standards in terms of volume and quality of disclosures in financial statements. This review also obtains that IFRS' impact on the reduction of cost of capital depends on financial reporting incentives, law enforcement, types of legal systems and various other country and capital market specific characteristics. Further, though there are some evidences to the contrary, the quality of earnings reported under IFRS has been established to be superior to that under other local standards.


The introduction of IFRS. Consequences for investment decisions

The introduction of IFRS. Consequences for investment decisions

Author: Simon Falcke

Publisher: GRIN Verlag

Published: 2020-07-09

Total Pages: 36

ISBN-13: 3346203107

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Seminar paper from the year 2019 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 1,0, Otto Beisheim School of Management Vallendar, language: English, abstract: Starting in 2005, the portion of foreign shareholders in the Dax has risen from 45% to 58% in the last decade. In the same year, the regulation of the European Union from 2002 came into effect which required all listed firms in the European Union to report their consolidated accounts in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) from 2005 on instead of each countries’ generally accepted accounting standards (GAAP). This is just one example where the volume of investments increased concurrently with the adoption of IFRS. Therefore, the question arises if the mandatory adoption of IFRS in the EU in 2005 or in other cases significantly affected and continues to affect investment decisions among adopters or third parties. In order to better account for differences between different types of investors and investees, we differentiate between retail investors, institutional investors and corporate finance activities. Moreover, we focus on the consequence of IFRS adoption on equity investment decisions as most research appears to focus on the equity instead of the credit market. Additionally, Lourenco & Branco point out that most research which finds no significant effects of IFRS adoption on investment decisions appears to focus on voluntary adoption before 2005. Thus, this paper mainly focuses on mandatory IFRS adoption. In this context, research suggests that mandatory IFRS adopters experience significant capital markets benefits as well as enhanced foreign institutional ownership and enhanced M&A activity. Ultimately, we observe four overarching drivers behind the aforementioned observations that impact investment decisions across different types of investors and investees.


Full Adoption of IFRS in Brazil

Full Adoption of IFRS in Brazil

Author: Ricardo Menezes Silva

Publisher:

Published: 2014

Total Pages: 45

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of full adoption of IFRS on earnings quality and the cost of equity capital of Brazilian public companies in the period of 2000-2011. Given the multidimensionality of accounting information quality, the portfolio approach was adopted, which is restricted to the analysis of: i) earnings management (EM); ii) conditional conservatism; iii) value relevance; and iv) timeliness. Moreover, assuming an increase in information after full adoption, this contributes to the reduction of asymmetric information in the capital market. A reasonable conjecture is that there will be a reduction in the cost of capital given the more efficient allocation of resources. This empirical study was based on a panel data approach and differences in differences. The sample was defined from the theoretical portfolio IBrX-100, as well as utilizing 30 companies that adopted IFRS in advance. The results show that the hypothesis of an increase in accounting information quality after IFRS full adoption holds true. On the other hand, the models for analyzing the equity cost of capital, based on Li (2010), suggest a reduction in the cost of capital of around 7 basis points for companies that adopted IFRS mandatorily starting in 2010.


International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Quality

International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Quality

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2009

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

We revisit evidence whether incentives or IFRS drive earnings quality changes, analyzing a large sample of German firms in the period from 1998 to 2008. Consistent with previous studies we find that voluntary and mandatory adopters differ distinctively in terms of essential firm characteristics and that size, leverage, age, bank ownership and ownership concentration influenced the decision to voluntarily adopt IFRS. However, regardless of the decision to voluntarily adopt IFRS, we find that conditional conservatism increased under IFRS for both groups of adopters, while evidence does not suggest an increase in value relevance under IFRS. Results on earnings management in the post-adoption period are mixed. While income smoothing decreases for voluntary but not for mandatory adopters, discretionary accruals only decrease for mandatory but not for voluntary adopters. However, further analyses suggest that the capital market environment and the economic cycle during the adoption period seem to be a more powerful explanation for this evidence than voluntary or mandatory IFRS adoption. Therefore, we conclude that incentives to voluntarily adopt IFRS did not unambiguously dominate accounting standards in determining earnings quality in the case of German firms. -- IAS regulation ; IFRS ; corporate ownership structures ; insider ownership ; incentives ; earnings quality


The German Financial System

The German Financial System

Author: Jan Pieter Krahmen (editor)

Publisher:

Published: 2004

Total Pages: 550

ISBN-13: 0199253161

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Written by a team of scholars, predominantly from the Centre for Financial Studies in Frankfurt, this volume provides a descriptive survey of the present state of the German financial system and a new analytical framework to explain its workings.


IAS/ IFRS

IAS/ IFRS

Author: Vera Palea

Publisher: FrancoAngeli

Published: 2006

Total Pages: 132

ISBN-13: 9788846480880

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Effects of Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

Effects of Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards

Author: Wai Ling Yap

Publisher:

Published: 2007

Total Pages: 180

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is said to produce higher quality accounting information, greater comparability of accounts, greater consistency of accounting processes, greater transparency between firms and lower costs of capital. However, there are arguments against the adoption of IFRS. The first objective of this study is to examine the accounting quality of IFRS earnings and equity, compared to the accounting quality of earnings and equity prepared under previous standards; that is GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) for United Kingdom, Hong Kong, and Singapore firms. The second objective is to investigate the effect of IFRS on the accounts (earnings and equity) of the average listed firm in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Singapore. These three countries are chosen because of their comparable historical Anglo-accounting system roots, but deviations in approaches during the accounting standards harmonization era. This study focuses on the initial adoption of IFRS, which is the most appropriate time to measure and fully capture the impact of the changes of accounting standards from GAAP to IFRS. The reason for this is because IFRS 1 First Time Adoption of International Financial Accounting Standards states that firms have to show reconciliations between previous GAAP and IFRS on (a) equity at the date of transition and the end of the latest period presented in the entity's most recent annual financial statements under GAAP, and (b) profit or loss of the latest period of the entity's most recent annual financial statements, with supplementary explanations necessary for understanding the transition. The results of this study shows the accounts of United Kingdom firms are most affected by the adoption of IFRSs when compared to Hong Kong and Singapore firms. Results also reveal that there is little evidence to conclude that financial statements prepared under IFRS are more market value relevant than financial statements prepared under GAAP.There is also little evidence to conclude that financial statements prepared under IFRSs are incrementally value relevant relative to financial statements prepared under GAAP. The conclusions are that countries that historically chose their GAAPs on selective IASs prior to the adoption of IFRSs were less affected by adjustments to companies equity and earnings. But these adjustments, even in the less harmonized companies in the United Kingdom, were not value relevant to the equity market.