Microcomputer-Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards
Microcomputer-Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards

Author: Robert F. Tinker

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2012-12-06

Total Pages: 399

ISBN-13: 3642611893

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Microcomputer-based labs, the use of real-time data capture and display in teaching, give the learner new ways to explore and understand the world. As this book shows, the international effort over a quarter-century to develop and understand microcomputer-based labs (MBL) has resulted in a rich array of innovative implementations and some convincing evidence for the value of computers for learning. The book is a sampler of MBL work by an outstanding international group of scientists and educators, based on papers they presented at a seminar held as part of the NATO Special Programme on Advanced Educational Technology. The story they tell of the development of MBL offers valuable policy lessons on how to promote educational innovation. The book will be of interest to a wide range of educators and to policy makers.

RealTime Physics: Active Learning Laboratories, Module 3
RealTime Physics: Active Learning Laboratories, Module 3

Author: David R. Sokoloff

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons

Published: 2012-01-03

Total Pages: 242

ISBN-13: 0470768894

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

RealTime Physics is a series of introductory laboratory modules that use computer data acquisition tools (microcomputer-based lab or MBL tools) to help students develop important physics concepts while acquiring vital laboratory skills. Besides data acquisition, computers are used for basic mathematical modeling, data analysis, and simulations. There are 4 RealTime Physics modules: Module 1: Mechanics, Module 2: Heat and Thermodynamics, Module 3: Electricity and Magnetism, and Module 4: Light and Optics.

Computer-based Laboratories Versus Traditional Laboratories in Physics Education
Computer-based Laboratories Versus Traditional Laboratories in Physics Education

Author: Lisa B. Casey-O'Brien

Publisher:

Published: 2005

Total Pages: 256

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of computer-based laboratories in physics education during a unit on Newton's Laws. The questions this study aimed at addressing were: Do computer-based labs increase student attitudes towards science more than traditional labs? and Do computer-based labs increase student understanding of physics concepts more than traditional labs? The study looked at 71 physics students in a public high school in California. They were primarily upper middle class Caucasians between 16 and 18 years old, with approximately equal numbers of male and female students. The method used was a quasi-experimental action research, which used percent differences between pre and post attitude surveys and content tests as data collection tools. The study found that students using computer-based labs had similar percent gains in content knowledge and similar attitudes to those using traditional labs. The data indicates that using computer-based labs to simply duplicate procedures of traditional labs does not increase student achievement. I believe computers must be used in labs to do things that cannot be done using traditional means in order for them to have a significant impact on student performance and attitudes. Key Words: computer-based laboratories, physics education, Newton's Laws labs, attitudes towards science, achievement in physicsThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of computer-based laboratories in physics education during a unit on Newton's Laws. The questions this study aimed at addressing were: Do computer-based labs increase student attitudes towards science more than traditional labs? and Do computer-based labs increase student understanding of physics concepts more than traditional labs? The study looked at 71 physics students in a public high school in California. They were primarily upper middle class Caucasians between 16 and 18 years old, with approximately equal numbers of male and female students. The method used was a quasi-experimental action research, which used percent differences between pre and post attitude surveys and content tests as data collection tools. The study found that students using computer-based labs had similar percent gains in content knowledge and similar attitudes to those using traditional labs. The data indicates that using computer-based labs to simply duplicate procedures of traditional labs does not increase student achievement. I believe computers must be used in labs to do things that cannot be done using traditional means in order for them to have a significant impact on student performance and attitudes. Key Words: computer-based laboratories, physics education, Newton's Laws labs, attitudes towards science, achievement in physics.