The Ethics of Belief Debate

The Ethics of Belief Debate

Author: Gerald D. McCarthy

Publisher:

Published: 1986

Total Pages: 264

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A collection of essays, which outline the debates between James and Newman, Stephen and Sidgwick, et. al.


The Ethics of Belief and Beyond

The Ethics of Belief and Beyond

Author: Sebastian Schmidt

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2020-04-03

Total Pages: 279

ISBN-13: 1000062007

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This volume provides a framework for approaching and understanding mental normativity. It presents cutting-edge research on the ethics of belief as well as innovative research beyond the normativity of belief—and towards an ethics of mind. By moving beyond traditional issues of epistemology the contributors discuss the most current ideas revolving around rationality, responsibility, and normativity. The book’s chapters are divided into two main parts. Part I discusses contemporary issues surrounding the normativity of belief. The essays here cover topics such as control over belief and its implication for the ethics of belief, the role of the epistemic community for the possibility of epistemic normativity, responsibility for believing, doxastic partiality in friendship, the structure and content of epistemic norms, and the norms for suspension of judgment. In Part II the focus shifts from the practical dimensions of belief to the normativity and rationality of other mental states—especially blame, passing thoughts, fantasies, decisions, and emotions. These essays illustrate how we might approach an ethics of mind by focusing not only on belief, but also more generally on debates about responsibility and rationality, as well as on normative questions concerning other mental states or attitudes. The Ethics of Belief and Beyond paves the way towards an ethics of mind by building on and contributing to recent philosophical discussions in the ethics of belief and the normativity of other mental phenomena. It will be of interest to upper-level students and researchers working in epistemology, ethics, philosophy of action, philosophy of mind, and moral psychology.


Responsible Belief

Responsible Belief

Author: Rik Peels

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2017

Total Pages: 289

ISBN-13: 0190608110

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book develops and defends a theory of responsible belief. The author argues that we lack control over our beliefs, but that we can nonetheless influence them. It is because we have intellectual obligations to influence our beliefs that we are responsible for them.


Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion

Kierkegaard on Self, Ethics, and Religion

Author: Roe Fremstedal

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2022-02-17

Total Pages: 295

ISBN-13: 1009084100

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Many of Søren Kierkegaard's most controversial and influential ideas are more relevant than ever to contemporary debates on ethics, philosophy of religion and selfhood. Kierkegaard develops an original argument according to which wholeheartedness requires both moral and religious commitment. In this book, Roe Fremstedal provides a compelling reconstruction of how Kierkegaard develops wholeheartedness in the context of his views on moral psychology, meta-ethics and the ethics of religious belief. He shows that Kierkegaard's influential account of despair, selfhood, ethics and religion belongs to a larger intellectual context in which German philosophers such as Kant and Fichte play crucial roles. Moreover, Fremstedal makes a solid case for the controversial claim that religion supports ethics, instead of contradicting it. His book offers a novel and comprehensive reading of Kierkegaard, drawing on important sources that are little known.


The Ethics of Belief Debate

The Ethics of Belief Debate

Author: Gerald D. McCarthy

Publisher:

Published: 1986

Total Pages: 262

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A collection of essays, which outline the debates between James and Newman, Stephen and Sidgwick, et. al.


Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?

Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?

Author: Robert K. Garcia

Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield

Published: 2009

Total Pages: 229

ISBN-13: 0742551709

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"Morality and religion: intimately wed, violently opposed, or something else? Discussion of this issue appears in pop culture, the academy, and the media - often generating radically opposed views. At one end of the spectrum are those who think that unless God exists, ethics is unfounded and the moral life is unmotivated. At the other end are those who think that religious belief is unnecessary for - and even a threat to - ethical knowledge and the moral life." "This volume provides an accessible, charitable discussion that represents a range of views along this spectrum. The book begins with a lively debate between Paul Kurtz and William Lane Craig on the question, Is goodness without God good enough? Kurtz defends the affirmative position and Craig the negative. Following the debate are new essays by prominent scholars. These essays comment on the debate and advance the broader discussion of religion and morality. The book closes with final responses from Kurtz and Craig."--BOOK JACKET.


Debating the Ethics of Immigration

Debating the Ethics of Immigration

Author: Christopher Heath Wellman

Publisher: OUP USA

Published: 2011-09-30

Total Pages: 350

ISBN-13: 0199731721

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Do states have the right to prevent potential immigrants from crossing their borders, or should people have the freedom to migrate and settle wherever they wish? Christopher Heath Wellman and Phillip Cole develop and defend opposing answers to this timely and important question. Appealing to the right to freedom of association, Wellman contends that legitimate states have broad discretion to exclude potential immigrants, even those who desperately seek to enter. Against this, Cole argues that the commitment to the moral equality of all human beings - which legitimate states can be expected to hold - means national borders must be open: equal respect requires equal access, both to territory and membership; and that the idea of open borders is less radical than it seems when we consider how many territorial and community boundaries have this open nature. In addition to engaging with each other's arguments, Wellman and Cole address a range of central questions and prominent positions on this topic. The authors therefore provide a critical overview of the major contributions to the ethics of migration, as well as developing original, provocative positions of their own.


Believing by Faith

Believing by Faith

Author: John Bishop

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2007-04-12

Total Pages: 263

ISBN-13: 019920554X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Does our available evidence show that some particular religion is correct? It seems unlikely, given the great diversity of religious - and non-religious - views of the world. But if no religious beliefs can be shown true on the evidence, can it be right to make a religious commitment? Should people make 'leaps of faith'? Or would we all be better off avoiding commitments that outrun our evidence? And, if leaps of faith can be acceptable, how do we tell the difference between goodand bad ones - between sound religion and dogmatic ideology or fundamentalist fanaticism? Believing by Faith offers answers to these questions, inspired by a famous attempt to justify faith made by William James in 1896. In doing so, it engages critically with much recent discussion in the philosophyof religion, and, especially, the epistemology of religious belief.


Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief

Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief

Author: Anthony Robert Booth

Publisher: Springer

Published: 2016-08-04

Total Pages: 108

ISBN-13: 1137557001

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls ‘Moderate Evidentialism’ – that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one’s evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa’s position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, and is well worth taking seriously in the contemporary debate. He reasons that this is especially the case since the position has salutary consequences for how to respond to the sceptic, and for how we are to conceive of extremist belief.