This book examines in detail the use of the pronominal adjective πας («all, each, every») in the Greek New Testament, focusing on how syntactical patterns and the semantic value of words or phrases it modifies are factors determining its sense and scope. These findings are applied to the interpretation of several debated passages in the New Testament.
Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener's 'A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament' is a foundational work that provides readers with a scholarly and detailed analysis of the New Testament. Written in a clear and accessible style, this two-volume set delves into the history, text, and interpretation of the scriptures, offering valuable insights into the process of biblical criticism. Scrivener's meticulous attention to detail, combined with his profound understanding of the subject matter, makes this book an indispensable resource for both scholars and students of the Christian faith. The work is considered a classic in the field of biblical studies, influencing generations of researchers and theologians. Scrivener, a renowned biblical scholar and textual critic, drew upon his vast knowledge and expertise to produce this comprehensive guide to the study of the New Testament. His dedication to accuracy and precision shines through in every page, making this work a testament to his scholarly acumen. I highly recommend 'A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament' to anyone interested in deepening their understanding of the origins and interpretations of the Bible.
The Criticism of the New Testament: For the Use of Biblical Students is a work of Frederick Scrivener, biblical scholar and textual critic. In this book Scrivener listed over 3,700 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, as well as manuscripts of early versions. The book is chiefly designed for the use of those who have no previous knowledge of the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. The main part of the work consists of descriptions of the manuscripts. Scrivener concentrated his attention on the most important manuscripts (especially five larger uncial codices). The later cursive manuscripts were too numerous to be minutely described as per the uncials. Scrivener described them with all possible brevity, dwelling only on a few which presented points of special interest and used a system of certain abbreviations.