Developmental Effects and Selection Pressure of Genuity VT3 PRO Field Corn on Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Developmental Effects and Selection Pressure of Genuity VT3 PRO Field Corn on Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Author: Michael Benjamin Von Kanel

Publisher:

Published: 2014

Total Pages: 72

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Transgenic corn and cotton expressing crystalline (Cry) insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) were commercially introduced in 1996. This technology has greatly improved the control of several key lepidopteran insect pests tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Farbricius), pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), southwestern corn borer, Diatraea grandiosella (Dyar), and European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea, has been more difficult to control using Bt crops and supplemental insecticide applications are often needed to prevent economic losses. A major threat to the longevity of transgenic technology is the evolution of resistance, especially when an insect pest infests both Bt corn and cotton in the same growing season. Similar Cry proteins are currently expressed in both corn and cotton commercial production systems. At least one generation per year develops on Bt corn before infesting cotton. Given that H. zea infests both crop hosts at some point every year, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the contribution and influence of Genuity VT3 PRO corn (expressing Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab) on H. zea density, fitness, and selection on BollGard II cotton (expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab). Non-Bt and VT3 PRO corn fields were sampled for larval density and any observed larvae were collected. Non-Bt field corn supported 61% more larvae compared to VT3 PRO fields. Larvae infesting non-Bt corn developed faster than those infesting VT3 PRO corn. Larvae collected from VT3 PRO corn had significantly higher pupal weight two out of the three years of this study. Pupae from VT3 PRO corn also had longer pupal duration two out of three years compared to pupae of larvae collected from non-Bt corn. Offspring from larvae reared on VT3 PRO corn had a higher LC50 compared to offspring from larvae reared on non-Bt corn. H. zea susceptibility to Bt is highly variable but the results presented here indicate that dual-gene corn hybrids such as VT3 PRO can select for H. zea populations with a higher propensity for causing damage in Bt cotton.


New Perspectives on the Management of Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in United States Sweet Corn

New Perspectives on the Management of Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in United States Sweet Corn

Author: Daniel Lucas Olmstead

Publisher:

Published: 2015

Total Pages: 170

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), the corn earworm, is a polyphagous caterpillar pest found throughout the United States and is a key pest of sweet corn. Chapter one is a review of literature relevant to the biology, ecology and management of H. zea in United States sweet corn production. Chapter two evaluates the predictive ability of male moth pheromone trap catch alone compared to a model that incorporates multiple factors on the biology and development of H. zea and the environment. Chapter three tests the efficacy of insecticides, registered for use against H. zea in sweet corn, in context to important timing windows during sweet corn ear development, as outlined in chapter two. The epilogue summarizes conclusions and identifies areas of future research. Chapter one is a comprehensive review of the literature relating to the biology, ecology and management of H. zea in United States sweet corn production. First, H. zea behavior, development, host interactions and ecology are reviewed, including host range, dispersal and migration, diapause and overwintering. Next, integrated pest management (IPM) practices for control of H. zea are discussed. Then, current tools including cultural, biological, chemical and transgenic controls for H. zea are reviewed. Finally, research needs likely to be of importance for management of H. zea in coming years are outlined. Female H. zea oviposit on sweet corn silks and yield loss occurs when neonates migrate into the ear under the husk to feed because a single larva can cause complete economic loss if the ear is for fresh market purposes. Chapter two examines current integrated pest management (IPM) guidelines for sweet corn that use pheromone trap-captured male H. zea moths to inform management decisions compared to models inclusive of additional factors relevant to ovipositional behavior or development of H. zea. Results of logistic regression and predictive discriminant analyses demonstrate that using multiple environmental and biological factors do, in fact, provide a higher predictive power than pheromone trap catch alone. These results show that IPM strategies to control H. zea damage in sweet corn should use multiple biological and environmental factors important for oviposition and infestation, and that pheromone trap catch alone is not the best predictor of damage at harvest. Chapter three draws on the conclusions of chapter 2, asking whether sweet corn can be protected more effectively if insecticides are applied to target the most attractive silking periods for female H. zea oviposition. The relationship between insecticide application timing from tassel through silk stages and marketable yield at harvest were evaluated in the field. Results were compared to yields resulting from current IPM recommendations for the northeast United States. The effectiveness of three registered insecticides (methomyl, chlorantraniliprole and lambda-cyhalothrin), each representing a different class of insecticide, were evaluated. Significant yield differences among insecticides and timing treatments were detected and the combined effects of active ingredient with timing determined the extent of H. zea damage. The efficacy of chlorantraniliprole as an effective means of H. zea control in sweet corn was unclear. In year 1, there was no significant effect of insecticide type or application timing, but there was a significant interaction effect between factors. In year 2, there was a significant effect of insecticide type. Chlorantraniliprole treatments resulted in significantly higher percentages of sweet corn ears compared to lambda-cyhalothrin. There was also a main effect of application timing. Four insecticide applications made from 50% tassel to 25% dry silk resulted in significantly higher percentages of clean ears at harvest compared with a single insecticide application made at 50% tassel. Compared to other timing treatments, however, there were no significant differences. 4 The epilogue provides a summary of conclusions reached from chapters one through three. This section also discusses areas of future research that include plant-insect dynamics, chemical ecology and possibilities for advancement of IPM strategies for H. zea management in the 21st century. 5.


Data Generation and Utilization for Evaluating Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resistance Management in Bt Field Corn and Cotton Through Computer Modeling

Data Generation and Utilization for Evaluating Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resistance Management in Bt Field Corn and Cotton Through Computer Modeling

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2004

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

To mitigate resistance development in pest insects to transgenic field corn and cotton expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins, the USDA and EPA have indicated that a high dose/refuge strategy is most effective, but single toxin Bt crops which predominate the transgenic crop acreage provide only a moderately high dose for one target pest in North Carolina, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), or bollworm. When a source of susceptible insects is present, moderately high insecticide doses are expected to result in resistance development more quickly than high doses. In theory, introducing a pyramided genotype expressing two different Bt proteins in the presence of a source of susceptible insects can more substantially delay resistance development than a single Bt genotype expressing a high or moderately high Bt dose. Herein, we determine the effects of transgenic field corn (2001 & 2002) and cotton (2003 -- 2005) genotypes expressing Bt proteins Cry1Ab/Ac & Cry2Ab, both singly and pyramided, on the development and survival of H. zea. Effects were documented by quantifying larval, pupal, and adult populations for each Bt crop genotype and a conventional sister genotype over time in eastern North Carolina. Each year all Bt field corn genotypes significantly reduced larval populations and production of pupae and adults below that of the non-Bt genotype with the pyramided Bt genotype significantly reducing these populations below each single toxin Bt genotype. Additionally, larval growth rate, pupal weight, and pupal length were reduced and adult eclosion date delayed by Bt field corn genotypes. Adverse weather conditions resulted in no useful data collected from cotton in 2003 & 2004, thus all cotton data reported are from two locations in 2005. All three Bt cotton genotypes significantly reduced the percentage of terminal regions and bolls containing live heliothine larvae and feeding damage compared to the non-Bt genotype with no significant differences a.


Genetically Engineered Crops

Genetically Engineered Crops

Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2017-01-28

Total Pages: 607

ISBN-13: 0309437385

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Genetically engineered (GE) crops were first introduced commercially in the 1990s. After two decades of production, some groups and individuals remain critical of the technology based on their concerns about possible adverse effects on human health, the environment, and ethical considerations. At the same time, others are concerned that the technology is not reaching its potential to improve human health and the environment because of stringent regulations and reduced public funding to develop products offering more benefits to society. While the debate about these and other questions related to the genetic engineering techniques of the first 20 years goes on, emerging genetic-engineering technologies are adding new complexities to the conversation. Genetically Engineered Crops builds on previous related Academies reports published between 1987 and 2010 by undertaking a retrospective examination of the purported positive and adverse effects of GE crops and to anticipate what emerging genetic-engineering technologies hold for the future. This report indicates where there are uncertainties about the economic, agronomic, health, safety, or other impacts of GE crops and food, and makes recommendations to fill gaps in safety assessments, increase regulatory clarity, and improve innovations in and access to GE technology.