Safety and Operations Guidance for Using Time-of-Day Protected-Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Using Flashing Yellow Arrows

Safety and Operations Guidance for Using Time-of-Day Protected-Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Using Flashing Yellow Arrows

Author: F. Adam King

Publisher:

Published: 2019

Total Pages: 61

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Selection of the left-turn phasing mode is a significant decision for the safe and efficient movement of left-turning traffic at signalized intersections. Because of different safety and operational effects associated with the signal left-turn mode, the two must be evaluated concurrently and be balanced based on capacity and crash potential when protected-only, permissive-only, and protected-permissive left-turn (PPLT) phasing modes are compared. The choice between left-turn phasing modes can be made on a time-of-day basis so that changing traffic conditions are accommodated appropriately. The purpose of this study was to define guidance that field traffic engineers can use to select the appropriate left-turn mode based on prevailing traffic conditions by time of day. In particular, guidance on the use of PPLT or permissive-only with flashing yellow arrows (FYAs) to indicate permissive movements was of interest to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Prior to the development of time-of-day guidance, the overall safety effects of converting between left-turn phase modes and indications (or displays) needed to be explored. The study examined the impact of converting from a circular “green ball” display for the permissive portion of PPLT phasing to the FYA signal indication and converting from protected-only phasing to PPLT with FYA. To quantify these conversions, a before-after evaluation of signal conversions was performed using standard Bayesian methods to develop crash modification factors from field data for 28 intersections in Virginia. For these intersections, the expected crash reduction after conversion from PPLT to PPLT-FYA was estimated as 12 percent (total crashes), 14 percent (fatal and injury crashes), and 30 percent (angle crashes), which was consistent with results from previous studies. In evaluating different left-turn phasing modes on a time-of-day basis, crash risk, left-turn conflicts, and capacity prediction models for permissive-only and PPLT modes were developed using simulation data. A total of 750 unique scenarios based on different combinations of intersection characteristics, traffic signal parameters, and traffic volumes were simulated in VISSIM, and trajectory files were processed using Surrogate Safety Assessment Model software to determine the number of conflicts per scenario. Based on the outputs of the simulation models, prediction models for determining left-turn capacities and the expected number of left-turn conflicts per hour per 100 left-turning vehicles were created using multiple linear regression. A final model predicting the average crash risk per hour based on the predicted number of conflicts was developed. The three models created were incorporated into a single spreadsheet tool that can be used by VDOT engineers in determining phasing mode on a time-of-day basis.


Flashing Yellow Arrow Traffic Signal Operation

Flashing Yellow Arrow Traffic Signal Operation

Author: Susan Elizabeth Chambers

Publisher:

Published: 2016

Total Pages: 218

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

ABSTRACTThis study examines the methodology for converting protected, permissive, and protected/permissive left-turn operation to flashing yellow arrow left-turn operation. This study addresses construction-related considerations, including negative offsets, lateral traffic signal head position, left-turn accident rates, crash modification factors and crash reductions factors. A total of 85 intersections in Glendale, Arizona were chosen for this study. These intersections included 45 "arterial to arterial" intersections (a major road intersecting with a major road) and 40 "arterial to collector" intersections (a major road intersecting with a minor road). This thesis is a clinical study of the field conversion to flashing yellow arrow traffic signals and is not a study of the merits of flashing yellow arrow operation. This study included six categories: 1. High accident intersections (for inclusion in Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding); 2. Signal head modifications only; 3. Signal head replacement with median modifications; 4. Signal head and mast arm replacement; 5. Signal head, signal pole and mast arm replacement; and 6. Intersections where flashing yellow arrow operation is not recommended. Compliance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) played a large part in determining conversion costs because the standard for lateral position of the left-turn traffic signal greatly influenced the construction effort. Additionally, the left-turning vehicles sight distance factored into cost considerations. Its important for agencies to utilize this study to understand all of the financial commitments and construction requirements for conversion to flashing yellow arrow operation, and ultimately to appreciate that the process is not purely a matter of swapping traffic signal heads.


Safety Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Arrow at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Arrow at Signalized Intersections

Author: Raghavan Srinivasan (Transportation engineer)

Publisher:

Published: 2020

Total Pages: 54

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This study evaluated the safety effect of the flashing yellow arrow (FYA) treatment at signalized intersections. The major objective of this strategy is to reduce the frequency of left-turn (LT) crashes, especially those that involve a collision between left turns and vehicles traveling straight through from the opposite direction. The project team conducted an empirical Bayes before-after analysis of installations in Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Oregon. The treatments were divided into seven categories depending on the phasing system in the before and after periods, number of roads where FYAs were implemented, and number of legs at each intersection. The first five categories involved permissive or protected-permissive phasing in the before period. Intersections in these five treatment categories experienced a reduction in the primary target crashes under consideration: LT crashes and left-turn-with-opposing-through (LTOT) crashes at the intersection level. The reduction ranged from 15 to 50 percent depending on the treatment category. Intersections in categories 6 and 7 had at least one protected LT phase in the before period, and after phasing had an FYA protected-permissive LT phase without time-of-day operation (category 6) and with time-of-day operation (category 7). Consistent with results from previous studies, these intersections experienced an increase in LT and LTOT crashes. The B/C ratios for categories 1-5 ranged from 56:1 to 144:1.


Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections Operating the Flashing Yellow Arrow

Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections Operating the Flashing Yellow Arrow

Author: Halston Tuss

Publisher:

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 54

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

At signalized intersections, pedestrians are considered to be amongst the most vulnerable. When in the crosswalk at intersections without protected left-turn phasing, pedestrians are particularly at risk from left-turning vehicles. Until recently, a wide variety of indications were in use across the US to indicate a permissive left-turn condition to the driver. In Oregon, the Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) has been used to indicate the permissive left-turn condition for approximately 10 years. With the addition of the FYA in the 2009 MUTCD, it is likely that its use will continue to increase nationally. Though many operational and safety issues have been studied about the FYA indication, this research proposes to fully investigate factors that influence driver behavior in the context of the permissive left-turn conflict with pedestrians. Specifically, the research seeks to study driver glance behavior to identify reasons why drivers are, "looking at but not seeing" pedestrians in or near the crosswalk or not searching for the presence of pedestrians at all.


Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conversion of Traditional Five Section Head Signal to Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) Signal

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conversion of Traditional Five Section Head Signal to Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) Signal

Author: Meshal Ibrahim Almoshaogeh

Publisher:

Published: 2014

Total Pages: 289

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In the United States, there are two schemes of operating traffic signal controls for permitted protected left turns (PPLT) namely the traditional five-section head system (known as Dog-House) and the flashing yellow arrow system (FYA). Past studies have agreed that these controls lead to decrease the average delay per left turn vehicle, decrease the protected green time, increase the left turn capacity, and enhance the intersection overall operation. The flashing yellow arrow (FYA) has been approved by the Federal Highway Administration as the national standard for the PPLT operations at signalized intersections. So, the Florida Department of Transportation also approved this new system and they are extensively replacing the traditional system with the new system on the area of Central Florida (Lin, et al, 2010). Both these systems have been used for a long time and there are some studies that evaluated these systems but there are limited number of projects that evaluated and/or compared between the two PPLT systems from the operational perspective.