Review of Fertilizer Offtake for Rabi 1987-88
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages: 86
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages: 86
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1987
Total Pages: 112
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: National Fertilizer Development Ce Ent Division Government of Pak
Published: 1992
Total Pages: 204
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 1104
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1992
Total Pages: 66
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Library of Congress. Library of Congress Office, New Delhi
Publisher:
Published: 1988-07
Total Pages: 734
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRecords publications acquired from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, by the U.S. Library of Congress Offices in New Delhi, India, and Karachi, Pakistan
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1990-07
Total Pages: 628
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Ali, Mubarik
Publisher: Intl Food Policy Res Inst
Published: 2016-04-01
Total Pages: 76
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe fertilizer industry in Pakistan, with US$3.74 billion per year in sales, now stands at a crossroads where, after an initial substantial contribution in boosting crop productivity, its future potential is being challenged. Fertilizer-responsive crop varieties, supplementary irrigation water, and a favorable policy environment in Pakistan have induced fast growth in fertilizer demand. On the supply side, the availability of gas at low prices along with a favorable investment environment resulted in the buildup of excessive manufacturing capacity. But recently, a shortage of gas and monopolistic behavior has led to underutilization and greater imports. Restrictive laws put fertilizer processing and marketing in a few hands, which has also affected its efficiency. Moreover, the yield response of fertilizer has tapered off and per hectare use is fast reaching its optimal level. The existing policy environment leads to higher costs, inefficient use, and a heavy burden on the government as it charges one-fourth of the market price for feedstock gas used in fertilizer manufacturing. In addition, the government imports urea and absorbs the difference in international and domestic prices.