The American Archivist

The American Archivist

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1970

Total Pages: 994

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Includes sections "Reviews of books" and "Abstracts of archive publications (Western and Eastern Europe)."


The Record

The Record

Author: United States. National Archives and Records Administration

Publisher:

Published: 1994

Total Pages: 718

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Guide to Genealogical Research in the National Archives

Guide to Genealogical Research in the National Archives

Author: United States. National Archives and Records Service

Publisher: National Archives & Records Administration

Published: 1982

Total Pages: 320

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Describes the kinds of population, immigration, military, and land records found in the National Archives, and shows how to use them for genealogical research.


The Confederacy

The Confederacy

Author: Henry Putney Beers

Publisher:

Published: 1986

Total Pages: 552

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A guide to Confederate records held in various repositories.


The Voting Rights Act of 1965

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

Author: Kevin J. Coleman

Publisher: CreateSpace

Published: 2015-01-02

Total Pages: 32

ISBN-13: 9781505554328

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Voting Rights Act (VRA) was successfully challenged in a June 2013 case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder. The suit challenged the constitutionality of Sections 4 and 5 of the VRA, under which certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting-mostly in the South-were required to "pre-clear" changes to the election process with the Justice Department (the U.S. Attorney General) or the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The preclearance provision (Section 5) was based on a formula (Section 4) that considered voting practices and patterns in 1964, 1968, or 1972. At issue in Shelby County was whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority when it reauthorized the VRA in 2006-with the existing formula-thereby infringing on the rights of the states. In its ruling, the Court struck down Section 4 as outdated and not "grounded in current conditions." As a consequence, Section 5 is intact, but inoperable, unless or until Congress prescribes a new Section 4 formula.