Morphological Decomposition in Heritage Turkish Speakers in the U.S.
Author: Esra Eldem (Graduate student)
Publisher:
Published: 2021
Total Pages: 102
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAbstract: The present study aimed to analyze the processing of morphologically complex words in heritage Turkish speakers in the U.S. Two separate priming experiments (English and Turkish) were conducted on 27 heritage Turkish speakers (HTS), 28 native Turkish speakers (NTS), and 21 native English speakers (NES). Experiment 1 (Turkish) compared the priming effects (if any), response times and error rates of heritage Turkish and native Turkish speakers. The derived word forms, i.e., adjectives formed with the denominal adjective marker -siz (e.g., sınırsız – sınır; ‘limitless – limit’) and nouns formed with the deadjectival nominalizer -lik (e.g., hastalık – hasta; ‘sickness – sick’) in Turkish were the foci of Experiment 1. Experiment 2 (English) investigated morphological processing in heritage Turkish and native English speakers by focusing on the English derived word forms attached by the denominal adjective marker -less and the deadjectival nominalizer -ness, which are the translation equivalents for -siz and -lik, respectively. The results of Experiment 1 indicated efficient priming in the morphologically complex (i.e., derived) Turkish word forms in both HTS and the NTS groups. Similarly, both HTS and the NES groups exhibited efficient morphological priming in derived English words in Experiment 2. Additionally, the results of the two experiments showed statistically significant differences in the response times between HTS and NTS groups in the Turkish experiment and HTS and NES groups in the English experiment. These findings were interpreted as indicating morphological decomposition in operation during early word recognition of morphologically complex Turkish and English words. Furthermore, the findings showed that although heritage Turkish speakers’ exposure to their L1 was comparatively limited compared to native speakers, they were still able to develop native-like morphological processing mechanisms. The slower response times of the heritage Turkish speaker group compared to both native speaker groups pointed out the importance of language exposure as well as the simultaneous activation of both Turkish and English during reading in one language. Lastly, to the researcher’s knowledge, this is the first-ever study conducted on the morphological decomposition and affix-stripping processes in heritage Turkish speakers in the U.S.