Moral Disagreement

Moral Disagreement

Author: Folke Tersman

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2006-03-13

Total Pages: 172

ISBN-13: 9780521853385

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Folke Tersman explores the nature of moral thinking by examining moral disagreement.


Moral Disagreement

Moral Disagreement

Author: Rach Cosker-Rowland

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2020-11-25

Total Pages: 275

ISBN-13: 0429957718

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Widespread moral disagreement raises ethical, epistemological, political, and metaethical questions. Is the best explanation of our widespread moral disagreements that there are no objective moral facts and that moral relativism is correct? Or should we think that just as there is widespread disagreement about whether we have free will but there is still an objective fact about whether we have it, similarly, moral disagreement has no bearing on whether morality is objective? More practically, is it arrogant to stick to our guns in the face of moral disagreement? Must we suspend belief about the morality of controversial actions such as eating meat and having an abortion? And does moral disagreement affect the laws that we should have? For instance, does disagreement about the justice of heavily redistributive taxation affect whether such taxation is legitimate? In this thorough and clearly written introduction to moral disagreement and its philosophical and practical implications, Rach Cosker-Rowland examines and assesses the following topics and questions: How does moral disagreement affect what we should do and believe in our day-to-day lives? Epistemic peerhood and moral disagreements with our epistemic peers Metaethics and moral disagreement Relativism, moral objectivity, moral realism, and non-cognitivism Moral disagreement and normative ethics Liberalism, democracy, and disagreement Moral compromise Moral uncertainty. Combining clear philosophical analysis with summaries of the latest research and suggestions for further reading, Moral Disagreement is ideal for students of ethics, metaethics, political philosophy, and philosophical topics that are closely related such as relativism and scepticism. It will also be of interest to those in related disciplines such as ethics and public policy and philosophy of law.


Moral Disagreements

Moral Disagreements

Author: Christopher W. Gowans

Publisher: Psychology Press

Published: 2000

Total Pages: 288

ISBN-13: 9780415217118

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The problem of moral disagreement is one of the central problems in moral thinking. This is the first anthology to bring together classic and contemporary readings on the topic.


Living with Moral Disagreement

Living with Moral Disagreement

Author: Michele S. Moses

Publisher: University of Chicago Press

Published: 2016-03-28

Total Pages: 148

ISBN-13: 022634438X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this book, Michele S. Moses offers a crucial new way for thinking about the affirmative action debate, one that holds up the debate itself as an important emblem of the democratic process. Central to her analysis is the argument that we need to understand disagreements about affirmative action as products of conflicts between deeply held beliefs about race consciousness as either a pernicious political force or a necessary variable in political equality. --Back cover.


Moral Disagreements

Moral Disagreements

Author: Christopher W. Gowans

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2013-04-03

Total Pages: 288

ISBN-13: 1134604556

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Can moral disagreements be rationally resolved? Can universal human rights be defended in face of moral disagreements? The problem of moral disagreement is one of the central problems in moral thinking. It also provides a stimulating stepping-stone to some of the perennial problems of philosophy, such as relativism, scepticism, and objectivity. Moral Disagreements is the first anthology to bring together classic and contemporary readings on this key topic. Clearly divided into five parts; The Historical Debate; Voices from Anthropology; Challenges to Moral Objectivity; Defenses of Moral Objectivity; and New Directions, the anthology presents readings from the following key thinkers: * Sextus, Empiricus, Chagnon, Wong, MacIntyre * Aquinas, Shweder, Brink, Rawls * Montaigne, Turner, Nussbaum, Narayan * Hume, Mackie, Gewirth * Nietzsche, Williams, Berlin. A distinctive feature of the anthology is that it brings philosophers into dialogue with well-known anthropologists. Also included is a comprehensive introduction by Christopher Gowans, introducing the problem of moral disagreement to those coming to the topic for the first time.


Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief

Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief

Author: Michael Bergmann

Publisher: Berkeley Tanner Lectures

Published: 2014-05

Total Pages: 321

ISBN-13: 0199669775

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Fourteen original essays by philosophers, theologians, and social scientists explore the challenges to moral and religious belief posed by disagreement and evolution. The collection represents both sceptical and non-skeptical positions about morality and religion, cultivates new insights, and moves the discussion forward in illuminating ways.


Reasonable Disagreement

Reasonable Disagreement

Author: Christopher McMahon

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2009-07-16

Total Pages: 215

ISBN-13: 052176288X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book-length treatment of reasonable disagreement in politics sheds light on this important and overlooked aspect of political life.


Ethics, Conflict and Medical Treatment for Children E-Book

Ethics, Conflict and Medical Treatment for Children E-Book

Author: Dominic Wilkinson

Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences

Published: 2018-08-05

Total Pages: 192

ISBN-13: 0702077828

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents’ wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new ‘dissensus’ framework for future cases of disagreement. This new book critically examines the core ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. The contents review prominent cases of disagreement from the UK and internationally and analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features around treatment disputes in the 21st century. The book proposes a radical new framework for future cases of disagreement around the care of gravely ill people.


The Normative Web

The Normative Web

Author: Terence Cuneo

Publisher: Clarendon Press

Published: 2010-03-04

Total Pages: 272

ISBN-13: 0191614815

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Antirealist views about morality claim that moral facts or truths do not exist. Do these views imply that other types of normative facts, such as epistemic ones, do not exist? The Normative Web develops a positive answer to this question. Terence Cuneo argues that the similarities between moral and epistemic facts provide excellent reason to believe that, if moral facts do not exist, then epistemic facts do not exist. But epistemic facts, it is argued, do exist: to deny their existence would commit us to an extreme version of epistemological skepticism. Therefore, Cuneo concludes, moral facts exist. And if moral facts exist, then moral realism is true. In so arguing, Cuneo provides not simply a defense of moral realism, but a positive argument for it. Moreover, this argument engages with a wide range of antirealist positions in epistemology such as error theories, expressivist views, and reductionist views of epistemic reasons. If the central argument of The Normative Web is correct, antirealist positions of these varieties come at a very high cost. Given their cost, Cuneo contends, we should find realism about both epistemic and moral facts highly attractive.


Foundations for Moral Relativism

Foundations for Moral Relativism

Author: J. David Velleman

Publisher: Open Book Publishers

Published: 2015-11-23

Total Pages: 158

ISBN-13: 1783740329

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In this new edition of Foundations for Moral Relativism a distinguished moral philosopher tames a bugbear of current debate about cultural difference. J. David Velleman shows that different communities can indeed be subject to incompatible moralities, because their local mores are rationally binding. At the same time, he explains why the mores of different communities, even when incompatible, are still variations on the same moral themes. The book thus maps out a universe of many moral worlds without, as Velleman puts it, "moral black holes”. The six self-standing chapters discuss such diverse topics as online avatars and virtual worlds, lying in Russian and truth-telling in Quechua, the pleasure of solitude and the fear of absurdity. Accessibly written, this book presupposes no prior training in philosophy.