Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Pile Driving Project - Phase II Study
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Pile Driving Project - Phase II Study

Author: Aaron S. Budge

Publisher:

Published: 2014

Total Pages: 514

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Driven piles are the most common foundation solution used in bridge construction (Paikowsky et al., 2004). Their safe use requires to reliable verification of their capacity and integrity. Dynamic analyses of driven piles are methods attempting to obtain the static capacity of a pile, utilizing its behavior during driving. Dynamic equations (aka pile driving formulas) are the earliest and simplest forms of dynamic analyses. The development and the examination of such equation tailored for MnDOT demands is presented. In phase I of the study reported by Paikowsky et al. (2009, databases were utilized to investigate previous MnDOT (and other) dynamic formulas and use object oriented programming for linear regression to develop a new formula that was then calibrated for LRFD methodology and evaluated for its performance. This report presents the findings of phase II of the study in which a comprehensive investigation of the Phase I findings were conducted. The studies lead to the development of dynamic formulae suitable for MnDOT foundation practices, its calibrated resistance factors and its application to concrete and timber piles. Phase II of the study also expanded on related issues associated with Wave Equation analyses and static load tests, assisting the MnDOT in establishing requirements and specifications.

Development of LRFD Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa
Development of LRFD Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 149

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

With the goal of producing engineered foundation designs with consistent levels of reliability as well as fulfilling the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) mandate that all new bridges initiated after October 1, 2007 be designed according to the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) approach, the Iowa Highway Research Board (IHRB) sponsored three research projects on driven piles (TR-573, -583 and -584). The research outcomes are presented in three reports entitled Development of LRFD Design Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa, Volumes I, II, and III, and other research information is available on the project web site at http://srg.cce.iastate.edu/lrfd/. Upon incorporating the regional LRFD recommendations from the completed research into the Iowa DOT Bridge Design Manual (2010) as it is being rewritten under the new title of LRFD Bridge Design Manual (December 2011), and adopting the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2010), this Volume IV for driven piles in Iowa was developed. Following the layout of a design guide, the application of the LRFD approach is demonstrated using various pile design examples in three different tracks, which depend on the construction control method used for establishing the pile driving criteria. Piles are designed using the Iowa Blue Book method. The pile driving criteria are established using the Wave Equation Analysis Program (WEAP) and the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) with a subsequent pile signal matching analysis using the CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP) in Track 3. The track examples cover various pile types, three different soil profiles (cohesive, non-cohesive, and mixed) and special design considerations (piles on rock, scouring, downdrag, and uplift).

Model Uncertainties in Foundation Design
Model Uncertainties in Foundation Design

Author: Chong Tang

Publisher: CRC Press

Published: 2021-03-16

Total Pages: 589

ISBN-13: 0429658397

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Model Uncertainties in Foundation Design is unique in the compilation of the largest and the most diverse load test databases to date, covering many foundation types (shallow foundations, spudcans, driven piles, drilled shafts, rock sockets and helical piles) and a wide range of ground conditions (soil to soft rock). All databases with names prefixed by NUS are available upon request. This book presents a comprehensive evaluation of the model factor mean (bias) and coefficient of variation (COV) for ultimate and serviceability limit state based on these databases. These statistics can be used directly for AASHTO LRFD calibration. Besides load test databases, performance databases for other geo-structures and their model factor statistics are provided. Based on this extensive literature survey, a practical three-tier scheme for classifying the model uncertainty of geo-structures according to the model factor mean and COV is proposed. This empirically grounded scheme can underpin the calibration of resistance factors as a function of the degree of understanding – a concept already adopted in the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code and being considered for the new draft for Eurocode 7 Part 1 (EN 1997-1:202x). The helical pile research in Chapter 7 was recognised by the 2020 ASCE Norman Medal.

Developing a Resistance Factor for Mn/DOT's Pile Driving Formula
Developing a Resistance Factor for Mn/DOT's Pile Driving Formula

Author: Aaron S. Budge

Publisher:

Published: 2009

Total Pages: 294

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Driven piles are the most common foundation solution used in bridge construction across the U.S. Their use is challenged by the ability to reliably verify the capacity and the integrity of the installed element in the ground. Dynamic analyses of driven piles are methods attempting to obtain the static capacity of a pile, utilizing its behavior during driving. Dynamic equations (a.k.a. pile driving formulas) are the earliest and simplest forms of dynamic analyses. Mn/DOT uses its own pile driving formula; however, its validity and accuracy has not been evaluated. With the implementation of Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) in Minnesota in 2005, and its mandated use by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in 2007, the resistance factor associated with the use of the Mn/DOT driving formula needed to be calibrated and established. The resistance factor was established via the following steps: (i) establishing the Mn/DOT foundation design and construction state of practice, (ii) assembling large datasets of tested deep foundations that match the state of practice established in the foregoing stage, (iii) establishing the uncertainty of the investigated equation utilizing the bias, being the ratio of the measured to calculated pile capacities for the database case histories, (v) calculating the LRFD resistance factor utilizing the method's uncertainty established in step (iv) given load distribution and target reliability. The research was expanded to include four additional dynamic formulas and the development of an alternative dynamic formula tailored for the Mn/DOT practices.

Developing Production Pile Driving Criteria from Test Pile Data
Developing Production Pile Driving Criteria from Test Pile Data

Author: Dan A. Brown

Publisher: Transportation Research Board

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 518

ISBN-13: 0309143357

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 418: Developing Production Pile Driving Criteria from Test Pile Data provides information on the current practices used by state transportation agencies to develop pile driving criteria, with special attention paid to the use of test pile data in the process.

Development of LRFD Design Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa
Development of LRFD Design Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 286

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) mandated utilizing the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) approach for all new bridges initiated in the United States after October 1, 2007. As a result, there has been a progressive move among state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) toward an increased use of the LRFD in geotechnical design practices. For the above reasons, the Iowa Highway Research Board (IHRB) sponsored three research projects: TR-573, TR-583 and TR-584. The research information is summarized in the project web site (http://srg.cce.iastate.edu/lrfd/). Two reports of total four volumes have been published. Report volume I by Roling et al. (2010) described the development of a user-friendly and electronic database (PILOT). Report volume II by Ng et al. (2011) summarized the 10 full-scale field tests conducted throughout Iowa and data analyses. This report presents the development of regionally calibrated LRFD resistance factors for bridge pile foundations in Iowa based on reliability theory, focusing on the strength limit states and incorporating the construction control aspects and soil setup into the design process. The calibration framework was selected to follow the guidelines provided by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), taking into consideration the current local practices. The resistance factors were developed for general and in-house static analysis methods used for the design of pile foundations as well as for dynamic analysis methods and dynamic formulas used for construction control. The following notable benefits to the bridge foundation design were attained in this project: 1) comprehensive design tables and charts were developed to facilitate the implementation of the LRFD approach, ensuring uniform reliability and consistency in the design and construction processes of bridge pile foundations; 2) the results showed a substantial gain in the factored capacity compared to the 2008 AASHTO-LRFD recommendations; and 3) contribution to the existing knowledge, thereby advancing the foundation design and construction practices in Iowa and the nation.

Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Driven Piles Using Dynamic Methods--A Florida Perspective
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Driven Piles Using Dynamic Methods--A Florida Perspective

Author: MC. McVay

Publisher:

Published: 2000

Total Pages: 12

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The parameters for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of driven piles using dynamic methods are presented based on a database of 218 pile cases in Florida. Eight dynamic methods were studied: ENR, modified ENR, FDOT, and Gates driving formulas, Case Analysis with Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP), Case Method for Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA), Paikowsky's energy method, and Sakai's energy method. It was demonstrated that the modern methods based on wave mechanics, such as CAPWAP, PDA, and Paikowsky's energy methods, are roughly twice as cost effective to reach the target reliability indices of 2.0 to 2.5 (failure probability = 0.62 to 2.5%) as the ENR and modified ENR driving formulas. The Gates formula, when used separately on piles with Davisson capacities smaller or larger than 1779 kN, has an accuracy comparable to the modern methods. The utilizable measured Davisson capacity, defined as ?/? (ratio of resistance/mean capacity) obtained from testing at beginning of redrive (BOR), is only slightly larger than the end of drive (EOD) values. Furthermore, past practice with driving formulas reveals the existence of a large redundancy in pile groups against failure. The latter suggests the use of a lower relatively reliability target index, ?T = 2.0 (pf = 2.5%) for single pile design. Also, the utilizable measured Davisson capacity, ?/?, for all the dynamic methods studied, is quite similar to published values (Lai et al. 1995; Sidi 1985) for static estimates from in situ tests.

Development of LRFD Design Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa
Development of LRFD Design Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 207

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In response to the mandate on Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) implementations by the Federal Highway Administration on all new bridge projects initiated after October 1, 2007, the Iowa Highway Research Board sponsored these research projects to develop regional LRFD recommendations. The LRFD development was performed using the Iowa Department of Transportation Pile Load Test database. To increase the data points for LRFD development, develop LRFD recommendations for dynamic methods, and validate the results of LRFD calibration, 10 full-scale field tests on the most commonly used steel H-piles were conducted throughout Iowa. Detailed in situ soil investigations were carried out, push-in pressure cells were installed, and laboratory soil tests were performed. Pile responses during driving, at the end of driving, and at re-strikes were monitored using the Pile Driving Analyzer, following with the CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program analysis. The hammer blow counts were recorded for Wave Equation Analysis Program and dynamic formulas. Static load tests were performed and the pile capacities were determined based on the Davisson's criteria. The extensive experimental research studies generated important data for analytical and computational investigations. The SLT measured load-displacements were compared with the simulated results obtained using a model of the TZPILE program and using the modified borehole shear test method. Two analytical pile setup quantification methods, in terms of soil properties, were developed and validated. A new calibration procedure was developed to incorporate pile setup into LRFD.