Listing and Delisting Processes Under the Endangered Species Act

Listing and Delisting Processes Under the Endangered Species Act

Author: United States. Congress

Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Published: 2018-02-12

Total Pages: 648

ISBN-13: 9781985286702

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Listing and delisting processes under the Endangered Species Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Water of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, on the regulations and procedures of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerning the listing and delisting of species under the Endangered Spe


The Endangered Species Act

The Endangered Species Act

Author: Stanford Environmental Law Society

Publisher: Stanford Environmental Law Soc

Published: 2001

Total Pages: 296

ISBN-13: 9780804738439

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This handbook is a guide to the federal Endangered Species Act, the primary U.S. law aimed at protecting species of animals and plants from human threats to their survival. It is intended for lawyers, government agency employees, students, community activists, businesspeople, and any citizen who wants to understand the Act--its history, provisions, accomplishments, and failures.


Endangered Species Act

Endangered Species Act

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment

Publisher:

Published: 1982

Total Pages: 698

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Listing and Delisting Thresholds Under the Endangered Species Act

Listing and Delisting Thresholds Under the Endangered Species Act

Author: Charles Sims

Publisher:

Published: 2020

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

We consider the case where a species provides a flow of economic benefits, is at risk of extinction, and is being considered for addition to the Endangered Species List. Listing a species as endangered is costly but increases the flow of social benefits and reduces the likelihood of extinction. If the species recovers sufficiently, additional costs can be incurred to subsequently delist the species. By treating listing and delisting as a pair of linked investment options, we provide an alternative to current practice for listing and delisting decisions that maximizes the return from public conservation investments. Under this alternative framework, we show that economic considerations may actually afford greater protection for at-risk species if these decisions are initiated early. However, biological sources of uncertainty may cause those species most in need of protection to be passed over in favor of more stable species that represent a “sure bet” for species preservation.