Direct Primary Law
Author: California
Publisher:
Published: 1912
Total Pages: 178
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: California
Publisher:
Published: 1912
Total Pages: 178
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John Avery Bond
Publisher:
Published: 1956
Total Pages: 1006
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Jonathan Winburn
Publisher: Lexington Books
Published: 2008
Total Pages: 268
ISBN-13: 9780739121856
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThis book tests the effectiveness of political control and neutral rules on limiting partisan gerrymandering in state legislative redistricting. Specifically, the book examines the 2000 redistricting process in eight states_Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Texas, and Washington.
Author: Paul Mason
Publisher:
Published: 2020
Total Pages: 804
ISBN-13: 9781580249744
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: William Anderson
Publisher:
Published: 1921
Total Pages: 480
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: League of Women Voters of Minnesota
Publisher:
Published: 1953
Total Pages: 34
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Kansas. Legislature. Senate
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 784
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Anthony J. McGann
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 2016-04-04
Total Pages: 269
ISBN-13: 1316589331
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThis book considers the political and constitutional consequences of Vieth v. Jubelirer (2004), where the Supreme Court held that partisan gerrymandering challenges could no longer be adjudicated by the courts. Through a rigorous scientific analysis of US House district maps, the authors argue that partisan bias increased dramatically in the 2010 redistricting round after the Vieth decision, both at the national and state level. From a constitutional perspective, unrestrained partisan gerrymandering poses a critical threat to a central pillar of American democracy, popular sovereignty. State legislatures now effectively determine the political composition of the US House. The book answers the Court's challenge to find a new standard for gerrymandering that is both constitutionally grounded and legally manageable. It argues that the scientifically rigorous partisan symmetry measure is an appropriate legal standard for partisan gerrymandering, as it logically implies the constitutional right to individual equality and can be practically applied.