Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty and the Conventional Balance in Europe
Author: Timothy E. Wirth
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages: 64
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Timothy E. Wirth
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages: 64
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Philipp Gassert
Publisher:
Published: 2020-12-14
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13: 9783525352175
DOWNLOAD EBOOKDer von Ronald Reagan und Michail Gorbatschow am 8. Dezember 1987 unterzeichnete Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, kurz INF-Vertrag, stellte einen Meilenstein der nuklearen Abrustungsverhandlungen zwischen den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und der Sowjetunion dar. Im Jahr 2019 wurde er von Russland und den USA gekundigt. Der englischsprachige Band untersucht die Vorgeschichte des Abkommens, dessen Implementierung und Folgen sowohl in den beiden Supermachten als auch in den mit ihnen verbundeten Staaten. Er ist damit die erste umfassende Darstellung eines der wichtigsten Abrustungsabkommen der jungsten Zeit.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages: 248
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Anna Péczeli
Publisher:
Published: 2021-02-15
Total Pages:
ISBN-13: 9781952565090
DOWNLOAD EBOOKFor decades, nuclear deterrence has been at the heart of the transatlantic relationship between the United States and Europe. It underpins European security, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) continuously commits to remaining a nuclear alliance as long as nuclear weapons exist. And yet, with a few important exceptions, transatlantic dialogue on nuclear issues largely declined with the end of the Cold War, particularly among non-governmental experts--and has only started to be revived in recent years. Rebuilding deterrence dialogue in response to a shifting strategic landscape is an important step in strengthening not only the transatlantic partnership, but also European security. This paper collection explores the evolving deterrence dialogue in Europe and identifies ways to inject new momentum into that dialogue. Renewed attention on the issue is particularly timely as European actors confront an adventurist Russia, rising China, and new technologies that will impact nuclear deterrence, U.S.-Europe relations, and institutions such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Author: Michael E. O'Hanlon
Publisher: Brookings Institution Press
Published: 2017-08-15
Total Pages: 171
ISBN-13: 0815732589
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn this new Brookings Marshall Paper, Michael O'Hanlon argues that now is the time for Western nations to negotiate a new security architecture for neutral countries in eastern Europe to stabilize the region and reduce the risks of war with Russia. He believes NATO expansion has gone far enough. The core concept of this new security architecture would be one of permanent neutrality. The countries in question collectively make a broken-up arc, from Europe's far north to its south: Finland and Sweden; Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus; Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan; and finally Cyprus plus Serbia, as well as possibly several other Balkan states. Discussion on the new framework should begin within NATO, followed by deliberation with the neutral countries themselves, and then formal negotiations with Russia. The new security architecture would require that Russia, like NATO, commit to help uphold the security of Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and other states in the region. Russia would have to withdraw its troops from those countries in a verifiable manner; after that, corresponding sanctions on Russia would be lifted. The neutral countries would retain their rights to participate in multilateral security operations on a scale comparable to what has been the case in the past, including even those operations that might be led by NATO. They could think of and describe themselves as Western states (or anything else, for that matter). If the European Union and they so wished in the future, they could join the EU. They would have complete sovereignty and self-determination in every sense of the word. But NATO would decide not to invite them into the alliance as members. Ideally, these nations would endorse and promote this concept themselves as a more practical way to ensure their security than the current situation or any other plausible alternative.
Author: Sten Rynning
Publisher: DIIS - Copenhagen
Published: 2011
Total Pages: 196
ISBN-13: 8776054322
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published: 2004
Total Pages: 369
ISBN-13: 1428910336
DOWNLOAD EBOOKNearly 40 years after the concept of finite deterrence was popularized by the Johnson administration, nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) thinking appears to be in decline. The United States has rejected the notion that threatening population centers with nuclear attacks is a legitimate way to assure deterrence. Most recently, it withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, an agreement based on MAD. American opposition to MAD also is reflected in the Bush administration's desire to develop smaller, more accurate nuclear weapons that would reduce the number of innocent civilians killed in a nuclear strike. Still, MAD is influential in a number of ways. First, other countries, like China, have not abandoned the idea that holding their adversaries' cities at risk is necessary to assure their own strategic security. Nor have U.S. and allied security officials and experts fully abandoned the idea. At a minimum, acquiring nuclear weapons is still viewed as being sensible to face off a hostile neighbor that might strike one's own cities. Thus, our diplomats have been warning China that Japan would be under tremendous pressure to go nuclear if North Korea persisted in acquiring a few crude weapons of its own. Similarly, Israeli officials have long argued, without criticism, that they would not be second in acquiring nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Indeed, given that Israelis surrounded by enemies that would not hesitate to destroy its population if they could, Washington finds Israel's retention of a significant nuclear capability totally "understandable."
Author: Michael Quinlan
Publisher: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)
Published: 1997
Total Pages: 94
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKEn studie vedr. kernevåbens betydning og indflydelse på sikkerhedspolitik og magtbalance