2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design

2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design

Author: Department Justice

Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Published: 2014-10-09

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13: 9781500783945

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

(a) Design and construction. (1) Each facility or part of a facility constructed by, on behalf of, or for the use of a public entity shall be designed and constructed in such manner that the facility or part of the facility is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if the construction was commenced after January 26, 1992. (2) Exception for structural impracticability. (i) Full compliance with the requirements of this section is not required where a public entity can demonstrate that it is structurally impracticable to meet the requirements. Full compliance will be considered structurally impracticable only in those rare circumstances when the unique characteristics of terrain prevent the incorporation of accessibility features. (ii) If full compliance with this section would be structurally impracticable, compliance with this section is required to the extent that it is not structurally impracticable. In that case, any portion of the facility that can be made accessible shall be made accessible to the extent that it is not structurally impracticable. (iii) If providing accessibility in conformance with this section to individuals with certain disabilities (e.g., those who use wheelchairs) would be structurally impracticable, accessibility shall nonetheless be ensured to persons with other types of disabilities, (e.g., those who use crutches or who have sight, hearing, or mental impairments) in accordance with this section.


Implementation of the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980

Implementation of the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980

Author: United States. Supreme Court. Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Study Committee

Publisher:

Published: 2007

Total Pages: 194

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Report evaluates how the federal judicial system has implemented the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980. Committee members include Justice Stephen Breyer (committee chair), U.S. District Judge Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. Circuit Judge Pasco M. Bowman, U.S. District Judge D. Brock Hornby, U.S. Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, and Sally M. Rider, Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice.


Judicial Integrity

Judicial Integrity

Author:

Publisher: BRILL

Published: 2004-05-01

Total Pages: 321

ISBN-13: 9047413717

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Traditional separation of powers theories assumed that governmental despotism will be prevented by dividing the branches of government which will check one another. Modern governments function with unexpected complicity among these branches. Sometimes one of the branches becomes overwhelming. Other governmental structures, however, tend to mitigate these tendencies to domination. Among other structures courts have achieved considerable autonomy vis-à-vis the traditional political branches of power. They tend to maintain considerable distance from political parties in the name of professionalism and expertise. The conditions and criteria of independence are not clear, and even less clear are the conditions of institutional integrity. Independence (including depolitization) of public institutions is of particular practical relevance in the post-Communist countries where political partisanship penetrated institutions under the single party system. Institutional integrity, particularly in the context of administration of justice, became a precondition for accession to the European Union. Given this practical challenge the present volume is centered around three key areas of institutional integrity, primarily within the administration of justice: First, in a broader theoretical-interdisciplinary context the criteria of institutional independence are discussed. The second major issue is the relation of neutralized institutions to branches of government with reference to accountability. Thirdly, comparative experience regarding judicial independence is discussed to determine techniques to enhance integrity.