High Performance Computer Export Controls
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs
Publisher:
Published: 2001
Total Pages: 56
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs
Publisher:
Published: 2001
Total Pages: 56
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published:
Total Pages: 60
ISBN-13: 1428971157
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published:
Total Pages: 52
ISBN-13: 1428975926
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs
Publisher:
Published: 2000
Total Pages: 128
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published:
Total Pages: 31
ISBN-13: 1428975918
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published: 2002
Total Pages: 37
ISBN-13: 1428944575
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn January 2002, the President announced that the control threshold above which computers exported to countries such as China, India, and Russia would increase from 85,000 MTOPS to 190,000 MTOPS. When the President changes the threshold, the National Defense Authorization Act of 1998 requires that the President provide a justification to Congress. The justification should, at a minimum, address the extent to which computers capable of performance between the established and newly proposed level of performance are available from other countries, address all their potential military uses, and assess the impact of such uses on U.S. national security interests. A related law also requires that we assess the executive branch's proposed changes. The justification for the President's January 2002 change to the control threshold for high performance computers was presented in a December 28, 2001, report to Congress. Thus, we (1) assessed the President's justification for the decision as presented in the December 2001 report and (2) identified other issues relevant to the decision to change the control threshold. To address these issues, we reviewed the statutory requirements for the justification, the documentation used by executive branch officials to support the conclusions presented in the report, and export control regulations pertaining to high performance computers. In addition, we obtained information from the 10 manufacturers listed in the President's report on the availability of high performance computers having the specifications described in the report. The information obtained from the manufacturers was supplemented with additional information obtained from a leading information technology industry market research organization. We also interviewed officials from the Departments of Commerce, Defense, and State who were responsible for producing the President's report.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
Published: 2000
Total Pages: 166
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published:
Total Pages: 36
ISBN-13: 1428973982
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on International Security, Proliferation, and Federal Services
Publisher:
Published: 1999
Total Pages: 140
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
Published: 2000
Total Pages: 64
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKBecause high performance computing is an important enabling technology for military purposes, the U.S. government controls the export of high performance computers to sensitive destinations, such as Russia and China, based on foreign policy and national security concerns. A high performance computer 1 has both civilian and military applications,2 operates at or above a defined performance threshold, and requires an export license to particular destinations, according to the Commerce Department, the agency responsible for licensing dual-use items. U.S. policy with respect to the export of sensitive technology, including computers, is to seek a balance between the U.S. economic interest in promoting exports and its national security interests in both maintaining a military advantage over potential adversaries and denying the spread of technologies used in developing weapons of mass destruction.