Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation
Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation

Author: Giorgio Bongiovanni

Publisher: Springer

Published: 2018-07-02

Total Pages: 773

ISBN-13: 9048194520

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal perspective. The main forms of legal reasoning and argumentation are covered in an exhaustive and critical fashion, and are analysed in connection with more general types (and problems) of reasoning. Accordingly, the subject matter of the handbook divides in three parts. The first one introduces and discusses the basic concepts of practical reasoning. The second one discusses the general structures and procedures of reasoning and argumentation that are relevant to legal discourse. The third one looks at their instantiations and developments of these aspects of argumentation as they are put to work in the law, in different areas and applications of legal reasoning.

Legal Argumentation and Evidence
Legal Argumentation and Evidence

Author: Douglas Walton

Publisher: Penn State Press

Published: 2010-11-01

Total Pages: 400

ISBN-13: 9780271048338

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton&’s aim is to provide a more expansive view of what can be considered &"reasonable&" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic, rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than truth.

Research Handbook on Law and Emotion
Research Handbook on Law and Emotion

Author: Susan A. Bandes

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

Published: 2021-04-30

Total Pages: 640

ISBN-13: 1788119088

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This illuminating Research Handbook analyses the role that emotions play and ought to play in legal reasoning and practice, rejecting the simplistic distinction between reason and emotion.

The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning
The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

Author: Keith J. Holyoak, Ph.D.

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2012-04-19

Total Pages: 865

ISBN-13: 0199734682

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning brings together the contributions of many of the leading researchers in thinking and reasoning to create the most comprehensive overview of research on thinking and reasoning that has ever been available. Each chapter includes a bit of historical perspective on the topic, and concludes with some thoughts about where the field seems to be heading.

Rhetoric and The Rule of Law
Rhetoric and The Rule of Law

Author: Neil MacCormick

Publisher: OUP Oxford

Published: 2005-07-28

Total Pages: 304

ISBN-13: 0191018783

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Is there any reasonable certainty about legal outcomes in dispute-situations? If not, what becomes of the Rule of Law? Neil MacCormick's book tackles these questions in establishing an overall theory of legal reasoning which shows the essential part 'legal syllogism' plays in reasoning aimed at the application of law, while acknowledging that simple deductive reasoning, though always necessary, is very rarely sufficient to justify a decision. There are always problems of relevancy, classification or interpretation in relation to both facts and law. In justifying conclusions about such problems, reasoning has to be universalistic and yet fully sensitive to the particulars of specific cases. How is this possible? Is legal justification at this level consequentialist in character or principled and right-based? Both normative coherence and narrative coherence have a part to play in justification, and in accounting for the validity of arguments by analogy. Looking at such long-discussed subjects as precedent and analogy and the interpretative character of the reasoning involved, Neil MacCormick expands upon his celebrated Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (OUP 1978 and 1994) and restates his 'institutional theory of law'.

Demystifying Legal Reasoning
Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Author: Larry Alexander

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2008-06-16

Total Pages: 254

ISBN-13: 113947247X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.

Methods of Legal Reasoning
Methods of Legal Reasoning

Author: Jerzy Stelmach

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2006-09-03

Total Pages: 237

ISBN-13: 1402049390

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Methods of Legal Reasoning describes and criticizes four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. The book takes the unusual approach of discussing in a single study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal method. Sketched this way, the panorama allows the reader to reflect deeply on questions concerning the methodological conditioning of legal science and the existence of a unique, specific legal method.

Handbook of Argumentation Theory
Handbook of Argumentation Theory

Author: Frans H. van Eemeren

Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

Published: 2019-11-05

Total Pages: 344

ISBN-13: 3110846098

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

No detailed description available for "Handbook of Argumentation Theory".

Informal Logic
Informal Logic

Author: Douglas N. Walton

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 1989-07-28

Total Pages: 304

ISBN-13: 9780521379250

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This is an introductory guide to the basic principles of constructing good arguments and criticizing bad ones. It is nontechnical in its approach, and is based on 150 key examples, each discussed and evaluated in clear, illustrative detail. The author explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound argument strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical questions for responding. Among the many subjects covered are: techniques of posing, replying to, and criticizing questions, forms of valid argument, relevance, appeals to emotion, personal attack, uses and abuses of expert opinion, problems in deploying statistics, loaded terms, equivocation, and arguments from analogy.