Journal of Proceedings, Board of Supervisors, City and County of San Francisco
Author: San Francisco (Calif.). Board of Supervisors
Publisher:
Published: 1915
Total Pages: 754
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: San Francisco (Calif.). Board of Supervisors
Publisher:
Published: 1915
Total Pages: 754
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: San Francisco (Calif.)
Publisher:
Published: 1884
Total Pages: 252
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: New York Public Library
Publisher:
Published: 1913
Total Pages: 402
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: San Francisco (Calif.).
Publisher:
Published: 1907
Total Pages: 476
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: San Francisco (Calif.)
Publisher:
Published: 1910
Total Pages: 838
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Bancroft Library
Publisher:
Published: 1964
Total Pages: 818
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: California State Library. Law Section
Publisher:
Published: 1893
Total Pages: 182
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: California State Library
Publisher:
Published: 1915
Total Pages: 1066
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKVols. for 1971- include annual reports and statistical summaries.
Author: California
Publisher:
Published: 1856
Total Pages: 268
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Clare Sears
Publisher: Duke University Press
Published: 2015-02-20
Total Pages: 329
ISBN-13: 0822376199
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn 1863, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors passed a law that criminalized appearing in public in “a dress not belonging to his or her sex.” Adopted as part of a broader anti-indecency campaign, the cross-dressing law became a flexible tool for policing multiple gender transgressions, facilitating over one hundred arrests before the century’s end. Over forty U.S. cities passed similar laws during this time, yet little is known about their emergence, operations, or effects. Grounded in a wealth of archival material, Arresting Dress traces the career of anti-cross-dressing laws from municipal courtrooms and codebooks to newspaper scandals, vaudevillian theater, freak-show performances, and commercial “slumming tours.” It shows that the law did not simply police normative gender but actively produced it by creating new definitions of gender normality and abnormality. It also tells the story of the tenacity of those who defied the law, spoke out when sentenced, and articulated different gender possibilities.